Pomegranates from an English Garden

On the last two lines, founded of course on the well-known passage in Job (xxxviii. 4-7), compare Dante:

“E il sol montava in su con quelle stelleCh’eran con lui, quando l’Amor DivinoMosse da prima quelle cose belle.”“Aloft the sun ascended with those starsThat with him rose, when Love Divine first movedThose its fair works.”– Inferno I. 38-40.

SHOP

ISo, friend, your shop was all your house!Its front, astonishing the street,Invited view from man and mouseTo what diversity of treatBehind its glass – the single sheet!IIWhat gimcracks, genuine Japanese:Gape-jaw and goggle-eye, the frog;Dragons, owls, monkeys, beetles, geese;Some crush-nosed human-hearted dog:Queer names, too, such a catalogue!IIII thought “And he who owns the wealth“Which blocks the window’s vastitude,“ – Ah, could I peep at him by stealth“Behind his ware, pass shop, intrude“On house itself, what scenes were viewed!IV“If wide and showy thus the shop,“What must the habitation prove?“The true house with no name a-top —“The mansion, distant one remove,“Once get him off his traffic groove!V“Pictures he likes, or books perhaps;“And as for buying most and best,“Commend me to these city chaps.“Or else he’s social, takes his rest“On Sundays, with a Lord for guest.VI“Some suburb-palace, parked about“And gated grandly, built last year:“The four-mile walk to keep off gout;“Or big seat sold by bankrupt peer:“But then he takes the rail, that’s clear.VII“Or, stop! I wager, taste selects“Some out o’ the way, some all-unknown“Retreat: the neighbourhood suspects“Little that he who rambles lone“Makes Rothschild tremble on his throne!”VIIINowise! Nor Mayfair residenceFit to receive and entertain, —Nor Hampstead villa’s kind defenceFrom noise and crowd, from dust and drain, —Nor country-box was soul’s domain!IXNowise! At back of all that spreadOf merchandize, woe’s me, I findA hole i’ the wall where, heels by head,The owner couched, his ware behind,– In cupboard suited to his mind.XFor, why? He saw no use of lifeBut, while he drove a roaring trade,To chuckle “Customers are rife!”To chafe “So much hard cash outlaid“Yet zero in my profits made!XI“This novelty costs pains, but – takes?“Cumbers my counter! Stock no more!“This article, no such great shakes,“Fizzes like wild fire? Underscore“The cheap thing – thousands to the fore!”XII’Twas lodging best to live most nigh(Cramp, coffinlike as crib might be)Receipt of Custom; ear and eyeWanted no outworld: “Hear and see“The bustle in the shop!” quoth he.XIIIMy fancy of a merchant-princeWas different. Through his wares we gropedOur darkling way to – not to minceThe matter – no black den where mopedThe master if we interloped!XIVShop was shop only: household-stuff?What did he want with comforts there?“Walls, ceiling, floor, stay blank and rough,“So goods on sale show rich and rare!“Sell and scud home,” be shop’s affair!XVWhat might he deal in? Gems, suppose!Since somehow business must be doneAt cost of trouble, – see, he throwsYou choice of jewels, everyoneGood, better, best, star, moon and sun!XVIWhich lies within your power of purse?This ruby that would tip arightSolomon’s sceptre? Oh, your nurseWants simply coral, the delightOf teething baby, – stuff to bite!XVIIHowe’er your choice fell, straight you tookYour purchase, prompt your money rangOn counter, – scarce the man forsookHis study of the “Times,” just swangTill-ward his hand that stopped the clang, —XVIIIThen off made buyer with a prize,Then seller to his “Times” returned,And so did day wear, wear, till eyesBrightened apace, for rest was earned:He locked door long ere candle burned.XIXAnd whither went he? Ask himself,Not me! To change of scene, I think.Once sold the ware and pursed the pelf,Chaffer was scarce his meat and drink,Nor all his music – money-chink.XXBecause a man has shop to mindIn time and place, since flesh must live,Needs spirit lack all life behind,All stray thoughts, fancies fugitive,All loves except what trade can give?XXII want to know a butcher paints,A baker rhymes for his pursuit,Candlestick-maker much acquaintsHis soul with song, or, haply mute,Blows out his brains upon the flute!XXIIBut – shop each day and all day long!Friend, your good angel slept, your starSuffered eclipse, fate did you wrong!From where these sorts of treasures are,There should our hearts be – Christ, how far!

There ought to be far more in a man than can be put into a front window. This man had all sorts of “curios” in his shop window, but there was nothing rich or rare in his soul; and so there was room for all of him in a den which would not have held the hundredth part of his wares. The contemptible manner of the man’s life is strikingly brought out by the various suppositions (stanzas 5, 6, 7) so different from the poor reality (8-9). All he cared for was business, which made him “chuckle” on the one hand or “chafe” on the other, according as times were good or bad (10). Even in his business it was not the real excellence of his wares he cared for, only their saleability (11). A merchant prince is a very different person (13-19). The last three stanzas give the lesson in a style partly humorous, but passing in the end to an impressive solemnity.

In connection with this should be read the companion piece, “House,” to which reference is made in the Introduction.

THE BOY AND THE ANGEL

Morning, evening, noon and night,“Praise God!” sang Theocrite.Then to his poor trade he turned,Whereby the daily meal was earned.Hard he laboured, long and well;O’er his work the boy’s curls fell.But ever, at each period,He stopped and sang, “Praise God!”Then back again his curls he threw,And cheerful turned to work anew.Said Blaise, the listening monk, “Well done;“I doubt not thou art heard, my son:“As well as if thy voice to-day“Were praising God, the Pope’s great way.“This Easter Day, the Pope at Rome“Praises God from Peter’s dome.”Said Theocrite, “Would God that I“Might praise Him, that great way, and die!”Night passed, day shone,And Theocrite was gone.With God a day endures alway,A thousand years are but a day.God said in heaven, “Nor day nor night“Now brings the voice of my delight.”Then Gabriel, like a rainbow’s birth,Spread his wings and sank to earth;Entered, in flesh, the empty cell,Lived there, and played the craftsman well;And morning, evening, noon and night,Praised God in place of Theocrite.And from a boy, to youth he grew:The man put off the stripling’s hue:The man matured and fell awayInto the season of decay:And ever o’er the trade he bent,And ever lived on earth content.(He did God’s will; to him, all oneIf on the earth or in the sun.)God said, “A praise is in mine ear;“There is no doubt in it, no fear:“So sing old worlds, and so“New worlds that from my footstool go.“Clearer loves sound other ways:“I miss my little human praise.”Then forth sprang Gabriel’s wings, off fellThe flesh disguise, remained the cell.’Twas Easter Day: He flew to Rome,And paused above Saint Peter’s dome.In the tiring-room close byThe great outer gallery,With his holy vestments dight,Stood the new Pope, Theocrite:And all his past careerCame back upon him clear,Since when, a boy, he plied his trade,Till on his life the sickness weighed;And in his cell, when death drew near,An angel in a dream brought cheer:And, rising from the sickness drear,He grew a priest, and now stood here.To the East with praise he turned,And on his sight the angel burned.“I bore thee from thy craftsman’s cell,“And set thee here; I did not well.“Vainly I left my angel-sphere,“Vain was thy dream of many a year.“Thy voice’s praise seemed weak; it dropped —“Creation’s chorus stopped!“Go back and praise again“The early way, while I remain.“With that weak voice of our disdain,“Take up creation’s pausing strain.“Back to the cell and poor employ:“Resume the craftsman and the boy!”Theocrite grew old at home;A new Pope dwelt in Peter’s dome.One vanished as the other died:They sought God side by side.

The lesson of this beautiful fancy is the complement of the “Shop” lesson. Even drudgery may be divine; since the will of God is the work to be done, no matter whether under St. Peter’s dome or in the cell of the craftsman (the Boy) – “all one, if on the earth or in the sun” (the Angel).

The poem is so full of exquisite things, that only a few can be noted. The value of the “little human praise” to God Himself (distich 12), all the dearer because of the doubts and fears in it (20-22); and the contrast between its seeming weakness and insignificance and its real importance as a necessary part of the great chorus of creation (34); the eager desire of Gabriel to anticipate the will of God, and his content to live on earth and bend over a common trade, if only thus he can serve Him best (13-19); and again the content of the “new pope Theocrite” to go back to his “cell and poor employ” and fill out the measure of his day of service, growing old at home, while Gabriel as contentedly takes his place as pope (probably a harder trial than the more menial service) and waits for the time when both “sought God side by side” – these are some of the fine and far reaching thoughts which find simple and beautiful expression here.

Longfellow’s “King Robert of Sicily,” though not really parallel, has points of similarity to “The Boy and the Angel.”

THE PATRIOT

AN OLD STORYIIt was roses, roses, all the way,With myrtle mixed in my path like mad:The house-roofs seemed to heave and sway,The church-spires flamed, such flags they had,A year ago on this very day.IIThe air broke into a mist with bells,The old walls rocked with the crowd and cries.Had I said, “Good folk, mere noise repels —“But give me your sun from yonder skies!”They had answered “And afterward, what else?”IIIAlack, it was I who leaped at the sunTo give it my loving friends to keep!Nought man could do, have I left undone:And you see my harvest, what I reapThis very day, now a year is run.IVThere’s nobody on the house-tops now —Just a palsied few at the windows set;For the best of the sight is, all allow,At the Shambles’ Gate – or, better yet,By the very scaffold’s foot, I trow.VI go in the rain, and, more than needs,A rope cuts both my wrists behind,And I think, by the feel, my forehead bleeds,For they fling, whoever has a mind,Stones at me for my year’s misdeeds.VIThus I entered, and thus I go!In triumphs, people have dropped down dead.“Paid by the world, what dost thou oweMe?” – God might question; now instead,’Tis God shall repay: I am safer so.

The Patriot, on his way to the scaffold, surrounded by a hooting crowd, remembers how, just a year ago, the same people had been mad in their enthusiasm for him. Anything at all, however extravagant, would have been too little for them to do for him (stanza 2; cf. Gal. iv. 15, 16); but now – ! The fourth stanza is very powerful. All have gone who can, to be ready to see the execution; only the “palsied few,” who cannot, are at the windows to see him pass. In the last stanza the thought of a more sudden contrast still is presented. A man may drop dead in the midst of a triumph, to find that in its brief plaudits he has his reward, while a vast account stands against him at the higher tribunal. Far better die amid the execrations of men and find the contrast reversed.

It is “an old story,” and therefore general; but one naturally thinks of such cases as Arnold of Brescia, or the tribune Rienzi. A higher Name than these need not be introduced here, in proof of the people’s fickleness!

INSTANS TYRANNUS

IOf the million or two, more or less,I rule and possess,One man, for some cause undefined,Was least to my mind.III struck him, he grovelled of course —For, what was his force?I pinned him to earth with my weightAnd persistence of hate;And he lay, would not moan, would not curse,As his lot might be worse.III“Were the object less mean, would he stand“At the swing of my hand!“For obscurity helps him, and blots“The hole where he squats.”So, I set my five wits on the stretchTo inveigle the wretch.All in vain! Gold and jewels I threwStill he couched there perdue;I tempted his blood and his flesh,Hid in roses my mesh,Choicest cates and the flagon’s best spilthStill he kept to his filth.IVHad he kith now or kin, were accessTo his heart, did I pressJust a son or a mother to seize!No such booty as these.Were it simply a friend to pursue’Mid my million or two,Who could pay me, in person or pelf,What he owes me himself!No: I could not but smile through my chafe:For the fellow lay safeAs his mates do, the midge and the nit,– Through minuteness, to wit.VThen a humour more great took its placeAt the thought of his face:The droop, the low cares of the mouth,The trouble uncouth’Twixt the brows, all that air one is fainTo put out of its pain.And, “no!” I admonished myself,“Is one mocked by an elf,“Is one baffled by toad or by rat?“The gravamen’s in that!“How the lion, who crouches to suit“His back to my foot,“Would admire that I stand in debate!“But the small turns the great“If it vexes you, – that is the thing!“Toad or rat vex the king?“Though I waste half my realm to unearth“Toad or rat, ’tis well worth!”VISo, I soberly laid my last planTo extinguish the man.Round his creep-hole, with never a breakRan my fires for his sake;Over-head, did my thunder combineWith my under-ground mine:Till I looked from my labour contentTo enjoy the event.VIIWhen sudden … how think ye, the end?Did I say “without friend?”Say rather from marge to blue margeThe whole sky grew his targeWith the sun’s self for visible boss,While an Arm ran acrossWhich the earth heaved beneath like a breastWhere the wretch was safe prest!Do you see! Just my vengeance complete,The man sprang to his feet,Stood erect, caught at God’s skirts, and prayed!– So, I was afraid!

“Instans Tyrannus,” the present tyrant, the tyrant for the time only, whose apparently illimitable power to hurt shrivels into nothing in presence of the King of kings, whose dominion is everlasting.

The poor victim of this tyrant’s oppression is a true child of God, but the nobility of his inner life is of course concealed from the proud wretch who despises him, and who, it must be remembered, is the speaker throughout. We must be careful, therefore, to estimate at their proper worth the epithets he applies and the motives he attributes to the object of his hate. He can, of course, think of no other reason why his victim “would not moan, would not curse,” than that, if he did, “his lot might be worse.” And again, when temptation failed to shake his steadfast patience, the tyrant is quite consistent with himself, as one of those who call evil good, and good evil, in speaking of him as still keeping “to his filth.” The last stanza is magnificent. Has the power of prayer ever been set forth in nobler language?

THE LOST LEADER

IJust for a handful of silver he left us,Just for a riband to stick in his coat —Found the one gift of which fortune bereft us,Lost all the others, she lets us devote;They, with the gold to give, doled him out silver,So much was theirs who so little allowed:How all our copper had gone for his service!Rags – were they purple, his heart had been proud!We that had loved him so, followed him, honoured him,Lived in his mild and magnificent eye,Learned his great language, caught his clear accents,Made him our pattern to live and to die!Shakespeare was of us, Milton was for us,Burns, Shelley, were with us, – they watch from their graves!He alone breaks from the van and the freemen,He alone sinks to the rear and the slaves!IIWe shall march prospering, – not thro’ his presence;Songs may inspirit us, – not from his lyre;Deeds will be done, – while he boasts his quiescence,Still bidding crouch whom the rest bade aspire:Blot out his name, then, record one lost soul more,One task more declined, one more footpath untrod,One more devil’s-triumph and sorrow for angels,One more wrong to man, one more insult to God!Life’s night begins: let him never come back to us!There would be doubt, hesitation and pain,Forced praise on our part – the glimmer of twilight,Never glad confident morning again!Best fight on well, for we taught him – strike gallantly,Menace our heart ere we master his own;Then let him receive the new knowledge and wait us,Pardoned in heaven, the first by the throne!

“The Lost Leader” is supposed to be the poet Wordsworth, who, on accepting the laureateship, abandoned the party of distinguished literary men who had enthusiastically supported the principles of the French Revolution. It is necessary, of course, to enter into the lofty enthusiasm of that party, and for the moment to identify ourselves with it, in order to appreciate the wonderful power and pathos of this exquisite poem. (See Wordsworth’s “French Revolution as it appeared to enthusiasts at its commencement.”)

The contrasts are very powerful between the one (paltry) gift he gained, and all the others (love, loyalty, life, &c.) they were privileged to devote (far richer than mere possession); and again, between the niggardliness of his new patrons with their dole of silver, contrasted with the enthusiastic devotion of his own followers, who having nothing but “copper,” would yet put it all at his service – having nothing but “rags,” were yet so liberal with what they had, that had they been purple, he would have been proud indeed, seeing that “a riband to stick in his coat” had proved so great an attraction.

Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.

Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».

Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.

Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.

1

It has been found necessary also to give only the latter part of the noble poem “Saul.” A slight sketch of the part omitted is given, and the poem is continued without interruption to its close.