Simple Truths of Life

As for the other extreme, it leads to the fact that a person decides to have sex with people of the same gender. This is a mistake, since the Spirit does not need the sensations arising from same-sex sexual relations (except for hermaphrodites on planets of the ninth category, for example, where it is natural).

Right there we can see why having sex with people of the opposite sex is the right thing – it is definitely not a mistake if there is love and spiritual affinity between two people of different sexes (and of course they know each other well enough that they want to live together for the rest of their lives). The Spirit wanted to experience such sensations, and therefore they will be able to pass through all 9 filters of the Higher Selves and reach the etheric ‘ocean’ that surrounds the Spirit.

Let's say people began to align themselves with nature and began to try to be in the golden mean, without going too far into the extremes of life (this means that, if I am correct in my reasoning, people are [no longer] neurotic). Why would a person, who does not have psychological problems and loves people of his own sex and people of the opposite sex equally, want to have sex only with people of the opposite gender? Perhaps you already understand perfectly well that it is all about knowledge – knowledge of what is natural and right, and will bring benefit and happiness, and what is a mistake and will bring suffering. Let us not forget about Palantius too.

For example, even though there are a lot of videos of anal “sex” on adult websites, I am, by and large, not interested in trying to do it. Why? I know that this is a mistake that can harm both the girl and myself (you can read on the Internet yourself about the possible consequences of such “sex”, if you are interested). It can also be added that the penetration of the girl into that place means that the girl may also want to shove something inside of her man in that very place – after all, both sexes have it and it plays the identical role, and therefore guys who want to shove their body parts in there should not resist when their girlfriends want to shove something into their rear places; and if they do not want to be poked in the rear, then they themselves should not ask a girl to let them have anal “sex” with her. Further, the sensations from such actions will never reach the Spirit, and for this reason, the Spirit created a system that shows people their wrong actions so that they can correct in their lives and do what the Spirit originally inserted them into the human physical body for. One of the reasons why it works this way is that free will of beings is one of the main foundations of a just Universe (for this reason homosexuals have the right to engage in their erroneous activities if it does not harm other people in any way. Of course, in return, they should also respect the free will of heterosexual people. Whether homosexuals want to use the knowledge gained to restore their sex orientation or not is also their free choice, and no one has the right to force them to do anything).

The topic of incest could also be mentioned as an example. Knowledgeable people will not have sex with the members of their blood family – no matter how attractive they are – because they know from other people's history what such actions can lead to. It could be said that such people choose not to have sex with their blood family’s members, and they choose not to have any sexual desires for their blood family’s members – no matter how “hot” they are.

Then I remembered how as a child, when I was still in elementary school, I sometimes began to daydream about what kind of [erroneous] sexual activity we could do with my friend when we saw each other again. But then, over time, I began to have sexual fantasies about girls – only about girls. I never thought about it, but now, as I am writing these lines, I understand that knowledge was the key. Over the course of my life, I realized that it was a mistake to have fantasies and sexual experience with a person of the same gender (to some extent I already understood this when I kept refusing to try oral sex for a long time).

I sometimes wondered in the past: “how during my next lives in a woman’s body I can be attracted to guys, if in this life I clearly like women?” And I sometimes I would realize that it would be logical to have a sexual desire for guys in a woman's body, since I would not have my current material knowledge. But in those days I could not connect that realization with psychology and with the cause of homosexuality. Now I understand another simplicity of life…

But there is someone else – a hermaphrodite (with fully functional genitals)… I would never have thought that I would have to talk about one of my wild, as well as rare, former fantasies… What can I say, nothing stays hidden for long… Here is the interesting thing here. In such fantasies, I imagined a person with the psychology of a female, and I often thought that if the hermaphrodite looked and behaved more like a male than a female (and therefore he would be perceived as a guy and not a woman), then I would not be attracted to “him” emotionally. But if that hermaphrodite looks and behaves like a female, and it is perceived as a female, then I have no problem imagining having sex with “her”. It turns out that we can either like or dislike sexually an absolutely identical person just because of the way he is perceived and seen by us in our minds. Psychology is very important, and psychological data also influence what decisions we make… By the way, if that imaginary hermaphrodite behaved in a balanced manner, having in his behavior the features of a woman and a man, then I think I would not mind being with “her”.

Here I can see a possible connection with my lucid dream, where I was in the girl's body, and I remember exactly that she liked guys (in fact – “me”, but I think it is better to write about that segment of the lucid sleep in the third person). This was due to psychology and the way she saw the world around her; and I have never experienced that psychological sensation during my entire life in my current male physical body (which I am, pretty much, happy about). But how are hormones related to the fact that I could really feel “what women want” in that lucid dream then? I will not repeat my reflections, which I already wrote about right after that dream; but we humans still have a lot to learn… I also understand that the psychological vision of that girl's world could be a consequence of her bisexuality, but due to the fact that I encountered the above feelings for the first time, I went to the extreme – that is, if this assumption is correct, then that girl liked both guys and girls, and not just guys, as I wrote earlier (after all, she happily began kissing with her female friend). To some extent, this experience confirms the above conclusions regarding the probable reasons for homosexuality caused by neurosis.

I will say again that you do not need to build psychological barriers and run away from your feelings. Here I also know from my own experience what I am talking about. I deliberately set myself at least two psychological blocks – and regretted it. Then, when I had certain urges for handsome guys, I did not run away from that, but I realized what was happening and I realized my mistake; I began to live in the present and accept things for what they are, and not for what they seemed to me. As a result, I am quite a full-fledged heterosexual.

Here we could remember about anonymous alcoholic clubs where all people in turn get up and say: “Hello, my name is [name], and I'm an alcoholic”. Those words are very important, since it is impossible to eliminate the problem if you refuse to recognize its existence – after all, knowledge plays a primary role in what decisions we make, and if you do not have knowledge, or you block it in your memory, then your decisions will not be able to solve a problem that does not exist in your head. Unfortunately, this topic is also close to me, since my father often refused to admit his problem of alcoholism, and every time my mother and I tried to talk to him about it, he quickly tried to change the topic. The reason lay in the psyche. A person without psychological problems can speak about absolutely any topic and not experience any discomfort during that. I myself have experience with psychological issues, and now I can, by and large, speak calmly about them, since I was able to remove many psychological problems from my life, and I try to work on eliminating the rest.

Here it is worth remembering that even though the phrase “mental illness” contains the word “illness”, as I happened to learn from my life experience, mental illnesses are not illnesses (if the reason does not lie outside the psyche – for example, in the physical or physiological body). People have psychological problems due to lack of certain knowledge, as a result of which those people make erroneous decisions in their lives. Such people should educate themselves, and then self-discipline, striving to live a correct, error-free life. Meditation and concentration can help a person gain control of his body and mind.

Note that there have already been many cases where unnecessary words in established phrases have led some people to wrong decisions. Recently, I came across an interesting video (https://youtu.be/D1-WuBbVe2E) which said how in ancient times there was no word “blue”; and then in that video it was said how the people of the Himba people in Namibia, not having a separate word for “blue”, cannot distinguish a blue circle among green ones as quickly as people who have a word for blue do. Words can have a big impact on how we psychologically perceive the world around us, and therefore we should better choose the words we use.

Personally, I have no doubts about the correctness of the main conclusions that I made for myself about homosexuals and transgender people. But I understand that other people can, and most likely will, have their own opinions on these two topics, since the truth is very simple…

Perhaps I myself would not have believed in the truth about stuttering if I did not have a personal experience by stuttering in my childhood. And perhaps I myself would not have believed in the probably causes of homosexuality (in case of neurotics) if I did not have a personal homosexual experience.

Also, I will mention just in case that you should strive to have one partner. Cheating is a mistake. And polygamy is usually wrong too, as other people can be left without a pair for the rest of their life.

In general, all these realizations made me admire again the genius and simplicity of the Universe.

***

In the fall, I decided that I should stop going outside, as the chance of contracting the coronavirus became very large with a new wave of infections, which exceeded thousands per day. I wanted to finish my book in order to close this important period of my life.

But that meant being alone for a while, since I certainly did not have a chance to meet a girl while sitting at home… but that was my best judgment.

If we pay for all our own mistakes with suffering, then the right actions bring good things into our lives. So, one elderly woman named Svetlana, who lives in our apartment building and sometimes asks me for various help, introduced me in November 2020 to a girl named Olya.

First, Svetlana took my phone number in order to give it to the girl. But she did not call – as it turned out because of work and repairs in her apartment. I doubted if I should find out her number myself and call her. I decided that I would not be passive, and just ask Svetlana if Olga got my phone number – there is no crime in this.

I did so, and Svetlana gave me the girl's phone number.

I called Olya on November 7th and we sometimes correspond.

We thought to meet and take a walk in our neighborhood. Many of Olya's acquaintances were sick with COVID-19, experiencing, in addition to fever, symptoms such as loss of smell and heavy breathing, and therefore Olya did not want to visit crowded places.

Coincidentally, she is also very busy with work, as well as with renovating her apartment, and we were never able to find free time and meet.

I myself almost never visit social networks and turn off the Internet on my phone in order to be distracted from my book as little as possible. As a result, we do not correspond much, but we still learned something about each other.

As always, even though I tried to avoid some topics, Olya herself led the conversation to them. I told her that this was not a topic for short correspondence – but I do not know if we will ever be able to meet in person. I like that Olya loves self-discipline, sometimes meditates, and, it seems, she is somewhat interested in various spiritual things.

But there is also a negative side which is that she, like many other people, sometimes strives to equalize people to one template, presenting her assumptions as reality – there were two cases that clearly showed this. What I can say here is that if you do not know something 100%, it is better to just ask the person a question instead of making hasty wrong conclusions from your old experience with other people who seem to you the same as your new interlocutor. Because of spiritual knowledge we can be very different people, even if on the outside we can seem “the same”.

I also have a lot to learn, and perhaps some messages could have been written a little differently, while others not written at all. But I did not want to become enrolled in the friend zone on top of other things.

In any case, whatever the future may hold, I might not have this experience and just be sitting alone with my work. At least this way I got some experience and learned something new from it.

Now, even though this summer experience is not quite what I originally intended to find in my life, but in return it gave me some important knowledge that can help me both in life and in my search, and these summer events also smoothly transfer us to the next unnumbered chapter of my book where I will tell my thoughts on how to properly organize a society so that people live in justice, honesty, and happiness.

Manifesto

In this manifesto, I am talking about hypothetical countries, except for those cases when a specific country is indicated in the sentence.

The word “spirituality” in this manifesto has little (if any) relation to any religions, and it refers, rather, to knowledge about the Superior Intelligence and the reasons for the creation of the material world, the Universe, as well as to the interaction of individual people with other people and creatures in the Universe. You can learn more about spirituality, as well as of other interesting and important things, in Michel Desmarquet's free e-book “Thiaoouba Prophecy” (also known as “Thiaoouba: The Golden Planet”).

I will start by mentioning the known to me foundations of life which will become the building blocks of my ideas in this Manifesto:

The Superior Intelligence (Spirit) created everything that exists materially.

People exist physically for the purpose of spiritual development. The reincarnation of the soul (Astral body) plays an important role in this development, since people can look at the world from different points of view, which depend on the material and spiritual knowledge accumulated by a person.

There is knowledge and there is faith. In simple words, faith is something that exists in our imagination, but not beyond it, knowledge is something that exists in our imagination and beyond.

Everything material is a simple vibration that creates in everything two extreme values with a balance in the middle. Everything that exists is under the influence of these vibrations and, accordingly, also has duality, balance, and periodicity in its features. That is, being in the middle, with a reasonable approach, gives the most fair and harmonious life.

There are wrong and correct actions/decisions. A person pays with suffering for each of his mistakes: instantly or after some time, which can be counted in lives. Wrong decisions include doing nothing and reworking something, excess work – balance also needed here. Correct decisions lead to a positive result, to happiness. Because of this Universal Law, it is beneficial for all people to come to a spiritually oriented organization of society, regardless of their position in society.

To maintain their existence, beings (in our case, people) need to have access to resources such as food, water, air, light, knowledge, minerals, etc.

To create tools, you need to have 3 ingredients: knowledge of how to make the tool; the resources from which the tool is created; and technologies/tools for creating a new instrument. Our physical body (hands, legs, etc.) is also a tool, with the help of which we can create the simplest tools, and then use them to create more advanced things.

Duality is also reflected in science. Blind faith in something on one side of the scale, and blind rejection of any little-known natural phenomena on the other (many scientists make a mistake here). The golden mean is when people study all the theories put forward, and also do not reject the possibility of the existence of certain things; people understand that they do not know everything, and they understand that there is a possibility that in the past people may have made a mistake in scientific conclusions about some Universal Laws.

Each person seeks to benefit for himself and makes decisions based on his material and spiritual knowledge that he has regarding the life situation in which he is.

Having almost finished writing my book, I realized a very interesting, important, and simple truth about what kind of social structures can ever appear on the planet.

We need to remember the sinusoid and gradient, where the bottom and top zones are errors, and only the part that is in the middle is the right choice, since it is completely balanced, containing the correct elements of the bottom part and the correct elements of the upper part.

Further, we remember that for a healthy, harmonious life, people need to have access to knowledge and resources/products such as food, water, minerals, light, air, etc. We absorb some resources into ourselves, and they keep our human body alive, while other resources can be used by people to create tools to make human life on the planet easier. Here you need to remember Thaora's words that technology should assist spiritual development, not confine people within a materialistic world.

It is worth noting for a better understanding of my thoughts that at present modern society does not need to create some resources on their own (air, light), but in general situations may arise when people need to create those resources that are so commonplace for us. An example would be a space station or a city on a “dead” planet, if we allow ourselves to use the imagination a little, where people need to artificially create both air and lighting.

I realized a long time ago that there is a relationship between people and resources/products. A person either makes the decision on how to get or produce a product, or someone else makes this decision for him. Then there can either be a barrier (money, for example) between a person and a product, or the barrier may not exist. Once I wondered – what if there is also a third dimension, so to speak, between man and resources? This would be logical, given what I know about the Universe and life… And so, while working on the Manifesto and writing in a separate file the methods for people to get products, I wrote down that people can either produce products by their physical labor, or products can be produced by robotics… This was what I thought could exist – the 3rd direction in relations of the human being with the products he consumes.

Thus, there are 3 types of relationships between individual people and resources/products, each of which has 2 extreme values (erroneous), as well as one average and balanced value (correct).

I list them all in the table below where:

The first red row shows how people make decisions on how to extract resources and/or produce products.

The second green row shows how people produce products and/or extract resources.

The third blue row shows how people get different products and/or resources.

The extreme ways of self-organization of society are depicted in color; they are erroneous and will lead to problems, and people will suffer for their choice to live under such a social structure. In the middle column without a colored background, there are the most correct and reasonable ways of self-organization of society, in which people will not experience the suffering of the two most extreme ways of organizing society. By products, I also mean resources.

Each person decides by himself how to produce the products he personally receives.

The word “chaos” comes to mind.

Then some primitive society comes to mind, where each person lives by himself

The society has a leadership that makes decisions about the production of products in the country, and it also deals with other issues of the country.

At the same time, people in society have complete control over the country, which they can choose to exercise through universal open voting.

Not a single person decides how to make a product.

The total slavery of society can be an example; when one country completely controls absolutely all the people of the other; or, if we will go into what is still fiction, when people (by mistake or with malice) programmed robots/machines in such a way that all people become enslaved by them.

Products are produced only by people – by their physical labor.

That is, people make products with their own hands.

Hunters and gatherers, for example.

Some products are produced by physical labor of people, and some products are made by machines/robots.

Products are not created by humans.

It is produced by machines/robots, for example.

People themselves do not work at all, since everything is completely automated.

There is no barrier between a person and a manufactured product, and any person, without exception, can receive it.

Example: You enter a “store”, take the product you need and leave the store with it. No money or other restrictions between you and the product on the “shelf” of the store.

The manufactured products necessary for a healthy life are available to all people without exception (there is no barrier between a person and such products), and all other manufactured goods are available only to working people (there is a barrier between a person and a product, without which one can live a healthy life).*, **

There is a barrier between a person and manufactured products, which can be a pass, money, etc.

If you come to the store, take the product you need there and go out with it into the street without giving money to the cashier, then you will be considered a thief with all the ensuing consequences.

* Some vital products, logically, may include: clean water; food containing all vitamins and minerals necessary for a healthy body; minimal housing (1-room apartment or a small land with a small house) with all modern conveniences; access to knowledge and education; access to public transport; access to medicine and treatment.

** Some individual people might say that vital products are given only to workers, and personal cars, multi-room apartments, special types of food, etc. given only to those who do not work… Even though such a very strange idea of distributing food among the population is theoretically possible, it does not have common sense and is not logical.

Before I go into more detail about the average, balanced, and what I believe to be the correct way of organizing society, I would like to take a moment to explain why I think that the most extreme ways of organizing society are wrong and will lead to suffering.

First red row:

The extreme, where each individual person decides by himself how to produce products, brings up two pictures.