скачать книгу бесплатно
Kazakhs and Turks
Almaz Braev
Kazakhs and Turks are two fraternal peoples belonging to the Turkic world. This book is an attempt to trace how these two peoples passed their way to modernity. What they experienced. What we have achieved. What they can be proud of. I’m sure it will be fascinating for the reader. We have not raised such a topic yet. Although a lot is written about the Turks. How they subjugated all neighbors, created great empires that is a lot of populism in such writing. It is my intended for readers to think
Kazakhs and Turks
Almaz Braev
© Almaz Braev, 2023
ISBN 978-5-0060-3591-1
Создано в интеллектуальной издательской системе Ridero
Chapter 1
Turks and Kazakhs
War must be inevitable and vital. As long as the life of the nation is not in danger, war is murder.
Mustafa Kemal Ataturk
War must be inevitable and vital. As long as the life of the nation is not in danger, war is murder.
Mustafa Kemal Ataturk
The Zerefs are the first, the most massive group of self reflection. These are warriors, ordinary people, workers and philistines. From a historical perspective, the self- reflection of Zeref means warriors, members of a tribal collective, where each Zeref, if necessary, is a warrior, alien to another Zeref from another tribe. I would not say that modern nationalists use the rudiments of the primitive culture of warriors. After modernization, people with zeref reflection can be found anywhere in the civilized world. In a crisis, even the intelligentsia – the gold of the nation – the Remids turn into savages out of anger and resentment against other savages and barbarians. It is this fallen intelligentsia that forms the idea of fascism. The Zerefs self are not capable of forming thought-forms, except for actions, for them the Nazi ideology is formed by feral, embittered Remids, but mostly the officers of the SS and blackshirts detachments are the Zeremids – children of the rural intelligentsia. In general, after modernization in the 20th and 21st centuries, the most rude people, philistines, people with low tastes and needs are Zerefs. It is the Zerefs who are biased and proud when they use the main tones of the Zerefs. Zerefs conventionally have two colors, two shades, a lot of sounds to express emotions, two sides and two sensations – good and evil. Evil and good they feel and understand as satiety and prosperity today only of their family, and in the past – prosperity and satiety only of their kind, clan, tribe and people. They say either yes or no but at the same time, they always look at the age of a person when answering. All traditional peoples have a very good quality, they respect and take care of old people.
The Zerefs understand the idea well as a pleasant emotion, because they draw satiety and prosperity, prosperity again as a minimum of family, a maximum for people. The idealism of the masses ends when the people do not receive the promised, for example, in the form of communism, as happened with the Zerefs of the USSR or at the time of democracy – this is already a common example of the birth of Nazism and fascism. The leader of the Zerefs must necessarily be a strong leader, because the Zerefs are ideological, they must know that they will receive democracy or communism. Communism and democracy are interpreted by the Zerefs not as equality, although the equality of the Zerefs is always welcomed, but the lands or trophies that the Zerefs are plucking. In democracy, the Zerefs like the first place. Or any honorable new place, because it is democracy that creates the illusion of a new, necessarily honorable place. In any idea, the Zerefs want to leave the social bottom that they occupy in the previous formation, in the old world, in the last state. Yes, Zerefs after modernization are a crowd of philistines. It will welcome democracy precisely because of mass opportunity. The conditional bottom is excited that all bottom creatures will float to the surface and will live there. But unfortunately for the Zerefs, they are creating a hierarchy again – with a new bottom and new top gold, with the new elite and the despicable rabble. A strong leader reduces the activity, or rather the greed of the Zerefs, teaches the Zerefs to work and responsibility. If the Zerefs do not have a dictator, the Zerefs will resort to the old habit of fighting for a new place of honor.
Chapter 2
When empires fall, the mob gets stupid
Nothing demoralizes the people like defeat. We must pay tribute to the Ottoman Empire it lasted almost as long as the Tokugawa Shogunate in Japan. Apparently, the Japanese shogun suffered because of the close proximity of the events. The Americans in 1858 showed the traditional tactlessness – a warning salvo from the most modern guns took place in the Japanese port. All people instantly turned from Japanese Bakufu giants into Japanese barakumin dwarfs, unable to defend the islands. As for the Turks, the most serious defeat was inflicted on the Turks near Vienna in 1683. But, as it was said, it took another two centuries for the empire to turn into a republic. For the Ottoman Empire to collapse, it took the defeat of Turkey as part of the Triple Alliance. Even the capture of Bayazed by Timur in 1402 or the defeat at Lepanto in 1571 from the Holy Alliance did not affect the fate of the Turks in any way. Because everything in the old days was decided by the Turkish nobility. The Turks empire held out for two more centuries. When the people decide, the empire falls faster.
(Nobody knows about this phenomenon yet but my readers will be the first to know. To begin with, knowledge is the privilege of priests. If information comes first today because dependence on momentary knowledge has turned into a global drug addiction. People, modern humanity, have changed knowledge for news. News is also knowledge, but information does not give full power. The power over the world is given by systemic knowledge, they are just part of the system of control over humanity. Humanity is given superficial knowledge so that people feel like Egyptian priests for a few minutes. But a crowd cannot consist of only priests – intellectuals, a crowd is a crowd, rabble, arrogant bloggers of social networks. It is on the total pride of the crowd that the calculation is made. Democracy adds to the total stupidity even more stupidity that all people allegedly are priests. Namely, that all people allegedly are artists, artists, writers, bloggers. But all people cannot be beautiful. So all people can’t be writers. Why are they given the opportunity? So that, having received information, people feel like «personalities» and kill real natural sages inside their world. For billions of people, «cattle» are got lost about self of this by the very rulers whom the most cynical writers call the 300 Committee – the world government. «Whoever owns the information owns the world.» Has everyone read this expression? Well, of course. If the head of the US Congress Nancy Pelosi finds out where the Americans’ funds will be directed, her husband will buy shares of enterprises in these industries. The Pelosi family will become very rich. Information is not knowledge. If people are allowed to look only at the tip of the iceberg, they will rejoice at the pieces of ice on the deck of the Titanic in the first minutes of the tragedy. Therefore, people were drummed into all ears from all sides about the fantastic killer virus. Before the planetary scam came to light, a dozen of my opponents called me an imbecile and with a Dunning – Kruger symptom. This is just an indicator of pride from some upstarts and bloggers planted by the diabolical media on the deck of well-fed, self-satisfied idiots, hysterics and others from the rabble squad.
Chapter 3
What is the reason for the war
When two zerefs look at each other, everyone knows who is the first, who is the second. Even the relatives of the brothers with a difference of a few minutes should replenish the formation of conservative soldiers. The society of tradition spends the least time on peeping and looking, even in a crowd, when hundreds of eyes are looking at you, they already know a lot. This gazing is delayed for a longer period. If some mentors, teachers, curators come to the people of the tradition and inform them, you are not any brothers, you are not a people, you are market individuals. Then even the twins begin to argue who personality is more important who have ten minutes more, after a while the whole nation starts a fight, which teachers, mentors, curators call democratic reforms.
In fact, democracy cancels not only seniority and zerefs are getting younger, they don’t want to give in, they don’t want to die. The whole crowd is getting younger, even the elderly are ready to give way to the young to the next world – they wear fashionable clothes so that they are not recognized now, drink filtered water so that there are no kidney stones. Teenagers brats approach the young men, address them like this: «Bro, let me smoke!» Disguised and trimmed «for democracy» old bros are a little embarrassed, but they give (and who is greedy, says that there is no cigar). Suddenly, everyone’s age disappears. That’s what democracy is when the devils come to the twins. It is impossible to prevent the Zerefs from considering each other. At any age, when Zeref looks at you, he knows where to stand: behind you or in front of you. And old age is not the only conservative marker. Although democratic zerefs from now on are always trying to deceive others, themselves, and time. People tell each other: «You’re still young, you’re still so young.» But it’s not because of democracy. These are still remnants of the conservative tact that remains with traditional people despite the devil’s propaganda.
"Good times give birth to weak people. Weak people breed difficult times."
These words of the ancient Greek Plato explain well why devils -neighbors come to the Zerefs. Why a conservative society is suddenly engaged in reformation. It seems that everyone walked in a general formation, obeyed informal laws. Now everyone’s gaze began to money. No one moves without a kick. They need a mate, obscenity, then a kick. Are the traditional people are lazy creatures? The first reaction to reforms is always a reaction. In any country, under any conservative regime, there is a part of the ruling elite, the so-called old men, clerics, who cannot be considered because of conscious blindness, because of laziness. The rabble and the common people cannot simultaneously replace the cream of society. The day comes, the hour comes when respected people are escorted to the next world with appropriate honors. And none of the high ranks intends to cancel this tradition.
But the fact is that the long absence of war delays all procedures.
There is always a whole queue of honorary veterans at the central churchyard. People were used to burying their traditional elite. Funerals change funerals. There are monuments on the main square of the country. Thieves and crooks have already settled comfortably among the crowd to gawk now.
The season of the «long world» also greatly influences the local evolution. A long peace softens morals of Zerefs. Cunning people, cowards, crooks, people from the Diaspora enjoy silence and funeral almost daily marches. The season of peace gives such an opportunity to penetrate into all spheres, because zerefs lose their vigilance, stop watching, do not look too closely. Requirements are reduced. The season of the long peace, it’s certainly very good for the cunning and weak people. When those most difficult times come after the good ones, people just like to remember them: when they had the kindest ruler (for example, Soviet people remember General Secretary Brezhnev – the kindest and incompetent puppet), after him came frankly vague. A conservative world must end in war. No one asks themselves questions, but how did these difficult times come? At this time, too many «twins» are born to go to war (because boys are born warriors here, they have to go to war. But now there is no such war).
Now I explain: all the cunning, crooks, hypocrites, thieves – the elite of liberal reformers just got into all spheres because of the lazy gaze of dying old men and the grave mood inside the funeral procession. «Good times breed weak people.» Good times have many traits. But the most important feature of officials of good times is their beauty – kindness. The leaders may be nondescript, but the ruling nomenclature is selected by outwardly pleasant, sympathetic Komsomol members, singers, cosmonauts, central television announcers. The ancient Greeks, Plato’s contemporaries, were just betting on physical perfection, the beauty of the body before ancient Greece lost. With decaying socialism, they relied only on the face, on the artists. In good times, all the artists are beautiful (in bad times, all the characters, on the contrary, are ugly, resemble freaks) No one looked closely at these artists, because there were good times – these are the times of artists and hypocrites – weak people, future traitors, philistines, defectors but the population was fine. There was no one to envy. Conservative people begin to envy and interfere with each other when order is violated, including the traditional funeral procession. The reformers who come to the twins to wean them off keeping the queue don’t come just like that. In order for worms to appear, the soil must be dewatered.
In the Ottoman Empire in 1809, Mahmud 2 – the Turkish Peter 1 ascended to the throne. In this pair, Russia was the first to carry out reforms. Turkish soldiers lost to the Russia in 1806 – 1829. Precisely because Mahmoud 2 was surrounded by elite old reactionaries, clerics. But the vizier Alemdar Mustafa Pasha Bayraktar helped him to ascend to the throne. Without Bayraktar, Mahmoud would not have succeeded at all.
But the liberal reforms of Mahmud 2 – Tanzimat – were just a copy of Peter's reforms. Mahmud 2 dressed the whole yard in European clothes. The main reforms concerned the rearmament of the army. Mahmud abolished the janissaries, abolished the sipahia – the Turkish oprichnina – the old land system for military service – replaced it with private property (ciftlik).
Yes, conservatives are going for reforms, primarily military ones. Civil reforms are secondary for them. This applies to everyone without exception. It is before the turmoil that the "beautiful" civilian population begins to listen to the military, because by this time all civilians are hypocrites, crooks, thieves or potential crooks, thieves are the very products of a long peace.
The reforms that the most energetic people are trying to carry out are designed to replace the real war, while it has not yet taken place, with military mobilization. Therefore, all the Young Turks reformers, Egyptian "free officers", Iraqi, Libyan, South American black colonels are all products of liberal military reformism. All monarchs are reformers, including Turkish Selim 3, Mahmoud 2, Libyan Idris 1 or even the father of the last Iranian Shah Reza Pahlavi were reformers. They trained only the military for capture or for the protection of their satrapies. But in order for the people to have Mustafa Kemal, Lenin or Hitler, it was the war that had to take place.
Yes, war has an ugly face. But it is the war that the crowds are preparing, hundreds of pretty handsome men who are admired by millions of inhabitants of the «good season». In a peaceful period of time, zealots, strong figures like Mustafa Kemal cannot break through to the top in any way. Because mass ignorance, jealousy, therefore fear and envy allow people to enjoy good rulers. In turn, good rulers think not about honor, but about memory, about huge mazars and pyramids that will remind of that good time when it was they who ruled.
Chapter 4
Now everything is bought and sold
Since Modern times, the very method of developing new territories has changed. After the usual robber seizure of new territories, the conquistadors, pirates, (even nomads) were followed all the time by unarmed people. They would have carried weapons, but they were forbidden to carry weapons. These unarmed people have done no less, and maybe more, for the development of new lands. They would have used weapons, they even did it when they became «citizens» after the revolutions, but they mastered a different weapon. I don’t mean religious missionaries. Go to any market where, without any violence, by mutual consent, that is, completely voluntarily, you will give your money for some thing. Any mini market «resident» will show you how all the new invaders acted before him in a visual way.
So, all modern states were created on the basis of a strategic treaty. This is not an elite contract, because before everything was kept on the balance of the aristocracy. The bourgeoisie, and we are talking about them when we mention the unarmed diplomats who seized this world – modern states have taken shape at the expense of world trade. And the alliance was made up of small people, completely small and insignificant from a position of strength, they are also small bourgeois – there have always been a lot of them, now they are the main planetary contingent. Without the strategic partnership of the «petty nobodies», not a single seizure of Indians, Africans, Asians and other savage territories in the opinion of these racists and chauvinists would have taken place. The whole of Asia is still trying to establish strategic alliances with the market nobodies, but nothing is working for the modern Asian elites (With the exception, perhaps, of Japan. But democracy for Japan is the path to annihilation, because it was through democracy that Japan lost the samurai spirit). All these elites, falling into bondage with the 7th-8th generation of bourgeois nobodies, begin to declare «commitment to democratic choice.» Of course, it is possible to convict these elites of their own plebeianism, because many Asian elites took place thanks to socialist revolutions (which were not invented by Asians at all. Socialism has raised the social bottom to a height, moreover. The children of the «working people» who «amazingly» turned out to be ungrateful – they abandoned socialism, that is, they betrayed socialism when they achieved power and money.
Chapter 5
Kazakh Bolivar
Why is there a discrepancy between Asians and democracy?
The word bourgeoisie in Asia is completely inappropriate in the common sense of usage, as this word is used all over the world, because the bourgeoisie got its name in London and Paris, and not in Nanjing or Dhaka. No one has ever thought about equality in a strictly class environment, especially with the elite. So it was in Egypt since the time of the Pharaohs, so it was everywhere where the landed aristocracy was noticed (the landed aristocracy was everywhere) For example, in Japan, the bourgeoisie was the most despicable class until the Meiji era. The aristocrats of Japan themselves raised the start of their peddlers of nonentities for guidance, so that they were motivated: "if these nonentities won in Europe, maybe we will be lucky" (in the same spirit, Kazakhs call children by the names of other peoples to deceive the spirits. Japanese and Kazakhs are very similar in animism) They copied the West fanatically, because they copied some incomprehensible force. Before Japan, Europeans colonized all of Asia. Where did they get their power from? That's what the frightened Japanese were interested in.
In Asia, everything was decided and decided by the elite – I ask everyone to remember this. Allied detachments opposed to some third force were considered partners. Another partnership is not possible. The strategic alliance extends only to blood ties through dynastic marriages (modern marriages of children of Kazakh officials and oligarchs are proof of this. We are Kazakhs, «yes, we are Scythians…", we wanted to sneeze at the modernization of Russians and Communists. Self reflection cannot be deceived). Only a strategic partnership at the blood level, so that if you glue the two tops together, you get a horde against a third party. This can explain the fragility of the so-called states of the same nomads as in the past so now. Why nomads? Yes, because the nomads have full ambitions until now. (We are belligerent, close in energy to the Highlanders, northern Indians). Yes, because the nomadic states, like the medieval feudal lords of Europe, had a fluidity: there was a specific leader, a bright leader (an outstanding personality – in different places with different common names). As a tribute, his colleagues tried to support his sons, and the sons tried to continue their father’s work – little turned out. Somewhere the hereditary system was preserved, monarchical dynasties appeared, somewhere the sons could do nothing. Attila’s empire collapsed immediately after the death of its founder – because Attila’s sons quarreled and fought. A barbaric partnership is impossible without subordination, without hierarchy. «Bolivar can’t stand two..» If two candidates appear, even several – this is an emergency. It follows from this: barbaric, pagan, feudal-monarchical, Asian-traditional partnership is possible only at the top among the elite. And this is not a partnership at all, but subordinated in a rigid hierarchy of its members. Nomadic so-called states cannot be called states in the European sense of the word. All the settled peoples of the so – called farmers could cooperate at the lowest level, the cooperation of the peasants went beyond one family – from the cultivation of the field to the cooperation of the whole people in the battles for harvests. Of course, there is still a Cosa Nostra in Sicily, and a Camorra in Naples as an indicator of family life. However, this is the south, the proximity of clan Africa also affected. Italy is an exception. Italy – until then was European Asia, ito informally. Accept at least a thousand laws in Asia, where clan «legislation» rules, these official laws will not work. Attempts by nomads to imitate China with the involvement of Chinese officials was not work. Only in the khan’s bet it worked. (Kazakhs, too, are mostly guided by the informal laws of tradition, only the market element has involved all sorts of lawyers, lawyers and other rascals in this matter). Now I want to ask the most honest descendants of the steppe people: what kind of state can there be if the people are guided not by khan’s laws, but by informal law. If people ignore the laws invented by the bourgeoisie in the name of bourgeois property. Kazakhs have never had property in the European sense of property. Kazakhs had everything in common, at least it was considered common, even after the property distinction. What kind of states did the nomads have, all the nomads, even the blue Turks. It was a horde where the elite spread their power to keep everyone, or to show that these people were protected. Kazakhs are still not ready for a strategic partnership, except for the same blood unions – dynastic marriages of the elite. A beggar Kazakh always will imitate a rich Kazakh – a strange thing. To conditionally group the beggars, they must turn into an elite. Having become rich, they will be grouped only by dynastic unions, having outlived their elite children. That’s where the Kazakh «state» actually lives. In order for the Kazakh to group with the Kazakh on an ideological basis, it is necessary for a million Kazakhs to migrate sharply from villages to cities and meet market laws there in all the cynicism of their non-necessity and mockery. Corruption is a mockery not only of officials over the European tracing paper of the state in the form of a union of trading, very greedy nobodies with low taste and needs, accompanying these people throughout history. The Union of Kazakh Nationalists is a very interesting, one might say a rattling union of the impossible. People who are incapable of strategic partnership due to personal ambitions and cultural individualism should unite sometime (in theory), although no one has seen this union yet. «Bolivar can’t take two.» Therefore, a nationalist party is never possible because of an unclear leadership criterion. Only in the form of force majeure, for a short period of the eruption of Mount Fuji when the enemy of my enemy is my friend and the prey is close and everyone sees it. No strategic partnership in Asia is possible, until today. Do not look at the declarations of Asian elites. Even Chinese Communists have their own party nobility. But the Han Chinese are not nomads. Moreover, the nomads are always scattered, they call natural separatism freedom. Such people are ready to break any association, especially the state, because of immanent anarchy.
Chapter 6
Where did the Kazakhs bourgeois come from
There are objective practices for the emergence of the bourgeoisie.
Conservative communities do not welcome the movement. The bourgeoisie appeared just from the movement of superfluous people because in every traditional family, ten children are born. Not necessarily every tenth of a litter of many children, – having many children as a condition, as a guarantee of escape of folk: many descendants of the bourgeois appeared in the cities from landlessness, that is, from poverty.
In order for people to understand the need for cooperation, they had to live in a peasant community themselves. Both in rural areas and in cities, cooperation was a guarantee of survival. So in Europe, workshops appeared in medieval cities. Why couldn't Kazakhs create workshops?
Who among the Kazakhs in general could be the first to turn into the bourgeoisie, given that the Kazakhs did not like money. Like all peoples of the tradition, the Kazakhs loved glory. That’s just out of love for status and contempt for the worthless, however, this feeling is familiar to the whole world, all peoples, Kazakhs appeared candidates for the bourgeoisie according to the Western type of maturation. If we take into account that the nomads did not like cities where strategic cooperation of the Kazakhs could take place. We need to find the reason the Kazakh cooperation without relation to the main Kazakh attribute – belonging to the Kazakh clan (ru). Poverty and rootlessness are the two main bourgeois assets. All the beggars and the rootless want to become famous, so that they are still respected it is fact.
If we remove the upper cooperation (in the revcon, this is called the upper dubbing, when the elite of the people is duplicated by another elite, necessary for the creation of a bourgeois class. Without the solidarity of former beggars who have turned into oligarchs, no modernization is possible. To create an industry, it is not at all a nomadic, not other primitive and feudal elite that is needed. All this traditional old elite should disappear. As practice shows, the primitive elite is destroyed by the new people themselves «in the name of progress». None of these people will change old habits. I’m talking about the personal egoism of the feudal elite, about reforms – changing the stereotype of the behavior of the whole people is out of the question. In order for new people to appear, a crowd of rootless people must appear when people do not remember their relatives. If people remember about pas kind, only external intervention is possible – this is an external double of self reflection, when representatives of other peoples act as teachers), or you can immediately get into the prosak. Yes, these reform teachers are destroying the selfish feudal elite in the name of progress. The versions that the primitive elites themselves will go to voluntary poverty in order to turn into the bourgeoisie seem to be seditious devilry, market demagogy. Japanese samurai would never agree to trade in order to retain power. Those who claim that the Kazakh primitive elite would have shown miracles of selflessness in the name of the people, would have led reforms, that is, ruined themselves and butchered themselves to the head in order to look like beggars, for this the people themselves had to take place, that is, a crowd of rootless scoundrels demanding for self a couple of hundred sheep from them. The bourgeoisie is formed from dirt and shit. From dirt, from conservative shit! This dirt and shit should be eaten by all future oligarchs, as the most unscrupulous people for tradition.
Zhataks (recumbent men) – poor Kazakhs, weeded out by Kazakh relatives for their inability to maintain movement – could be the first to render in a foreign environment and in foreign cities, fate itself gives a chance to such all the poor. If they did not feel alienated from exactly the same generic dregs, some despicable Sarts should have felt contempt for exactly the same Kazakhs from other clans instead of being ready to cooperate. (Kazakhs do not let strangers, that is, not relatives Kazakhs into the Nauryz pagan wise holiday yurt even now! And they stuttering about the Kazakh strategic cooperation. This is an absent Kazakh feeling) It is they who could establish cooperation. If not for one thing that It is precisely that the Kazakhs all remember their kinds. With this memory they build their modern power. And at the same time they walk with the illusion that it is possible to build democracy at the same time. What each Kazakh has under democracy is a separate topic. And this topic does not go far from the Kazakh self -reflection.
Chapter 7
Why the American Indians lost. The Path of Big Wings
There are notes of Columbus about the meeting of Indians with Europeans. There he described them as resembling children. This is true, including in the matter of strategic cooperation. An Indian of any age is not authorized to meet an enemy or relative, but people whose strategic cooperation literally replaces the smell of blood: if their own blood, if thia man their tribe that man is a friend, if not their own blood, it is a member of another tribe. If the same Indians had been in the place of Columbus' sailors, the first Indians might have eaten them. As it was, their curiosity kept Columbus alive. He saw not children, but unauthorized Indians for such meetings.
When the settlers who arrived from the Atlantic side created settlement agglomerations for several generations, they began to penetrate deep into the American continent, the Indians showed their inferiority-complete incompetence. Apart from guerrilla tactics, they had nothing to oppose the white people. Of course, they created tribal alliances, but this was not enough for a strategic confrontation. White people surpassed the Aborigines not only in weapons and tactics, but most importantly, the whites had the ability to cooperate, to cooperate on the basis of the small interests of the small owners. The great Indian myths could not help them in any way because the Indians were not capable of cooperation, joint actions, except for the "warpath" based on the interest of blood. Without the most extreme need, the tribes are not capable of cooperation, in order for the Zerefs to have a strategic friendship – this is only when there is a war and when on the edge of the abyss. In other cases, the Zerefs will look at you for a long time to come forward, or to trample you. All other meetings of the Zerefs outside their ancestral villages are a meeting of warriors and knight riders – a meeting of two wolves, rather jackals. This policy is maintained until the very last moment. (When a Kazakh looks at a Kazakh, he does not just look at the "knight", he is a "cozben atada" (shoots with his eyes). Most likely, the Indians also looked at each other with heavy eyes without blinking at a chance meeting, creating a heavy look).
The Indian elite, Indian leaders, Indian shamans also could not do anything, could not help their peoples in any way. The fate of the Indians is sad. Too many tribes – too many «states». They were with the elite also incapable of a strategic agreement. Let savages go the way of heroes. All tribes followed the path of tribal glory. No conservative people at the stage of «naturals» are able to survive if they are surrounded by small people who can win without blood, without a fight – just by selling and buying. People came to the Indians who were able to unite for small gain, create punitive detachments. From the particular to the general. This is what distinguishes the petty bourgeois (zere, refags) from the generally wild people who shoot at each other all the time with their eyes. The «path of heroes», the «path of glory», which distinguishes all conservative peoples, dooms such an elite to death in the first place. These people would never have adapted to the «white» trick. Most of the people simply have to die after their own elite, because apart from curiosity, then complexes – after the first realization of their impotence, these people are not capable of anything. This is the fatal tax of all conservative peoples until the savages assimilate the first skills of cooperation except kinship, except blood. This means that the entire older generation of the «curious» should also have gone to the valley of death, all barbarians are very persistent, stupidly stubborn when they try to retrain them even with the help of violence. The colonizers even had to import Negroes from faraway Africa to the plantations. By the way, African leaders sold young, physically strong people. For during a storm, swifts with medium wings survive. Those who have too big wings are carried away by the wind, those who have short wings, they themselves fall to the ground and break. So, in order to assimilate the Tatar tribe, Genghis Khan executed all adults, leaving only children who could pass under the cart.
Chapter 8
Top dubbing
My books are not voluminous. Maximum of 200 pages. The main idea can be said in one chapter. But this will not give understanding, so, the "understanding" stretches to 120 pages. The remaining 80 pages remain in reserve – for new discoveries on the topic.
Three books have been selected for the manual so far: "Kazakhs and Arabs", "Kazakhs and Japanese", Kazakhs and Turks", because Arabs, Japanese, Turks are successful nations today. (Which cannot be said about the Kazakhs yet). Arabs, Japanese, Turks have their own history, their own way, their own choice, these three nations are chosen to show where we are. Ordinary people don't like difficult situations. Therefore, instead of a complex " self- reflection", that is, a mirror that no one likes to look into, another tactic was chosen – to look at yourself against the background of successful Arabs, Japanese and Turks. Why do they succeed in the end, but the Kazakhs do not. If Confucius said "If it seems to you that the goal is unattainable, do not change the goal – change your plan of action" – this is just right. Tactics have changed, but the strategy remains.
The main argument of the Kazakh nationalists: "if it were not for the Russians, if it were not for the Bolsheviks, we, the Kazakhs would be at a high level." A lot of biased material has appeared. It is populism. Betting on arguments that clearly contradict the facts is always the way to nowhere. "Fanatics can seize power. But they will never hold the victory. From fanaticism get tired" From fanaticism, first of all, the audience gets tired, to whom the fate of sacrificial sheep is prepared by fanatics. It is enough to look at the speech of patriots in the parliament of one belligerent republic of the former USSR. No one listens to anyone there. But everyone comes to the podium and spews patriotic mantras and curses. Patriotic mantras and curses have already led this people to war, but spewing mantras and curses in 404 is a very profitable occupation. These parliamentarians themselves live happily ever after. At this very time, the people wash themselves, as they say, with blood. Why is there so much cynicism in 404? Why did we, the Kazakhs, lag behind them? Is it good or is it bad? Our "backwardness", more precisely, our conservatism and "shukur" save us.
In order not to repeat the path the state of 404 under the leadership of top scammers, you need a little honesty and logic. You need to look a little in the mirror of facts.
Revcon has the concept of upper and lower dubbing.
Lower dubbing is when people with low status and reflection perform the tasks of noble people. For example, the communist ideology proclaimed the dictatorship of the proletariat. The proletarians began to play the role of the aristocracy. Kazakhs are not interested in what came out of it. The supposed Kazakh reaction will be this: we had our own elite. If the Alash elite it had been preserved, we would have lived at the level of the Japanese. The Russian Bolsheviks prevented us. But is it so?
As we can see, the whole fate of the people rests on the concept of the elite.
Arabs, Japanese, Turks have preserved Arab, Japanese, Turkish – in general, their own elite. Kazakhs were not ruled by Kazakhs. Although for 30 years Kazakhs have been ruled by Kazakhs, and the results are medieval against the background of modern technologies. There is no gap beyond the words «kazaksha soyle» (you must speaking by kazakh). In addition to mineral resources, Kazakhs have put singers and boxers on the world market (now even a chess player lady has appeared).
Although the current regime continues the tactics of a low double – it is recruiting managers "from the people", who, as they say, is "still there". There can be no other way. A low double was always at hand for conservative dictatorships. It was the Communists who brought the conservative double to the level of holy dirt (although this has nothing to do with the Communists, Marxism itself, the Marxists themselves treated the tradition arrogantly, but the ideology of Marxism itself is a pure lower double).
All regimes before communism and before the 20th century, all traditional elites used a high double to create assistants for themselves without violating the current hierarchy. That is, the feudal lords could choose from the people and protect the most talented children of commoners, and commoners understood that they were commoners and did not encroach on conservative orders.
What is the difference between a high dubbing and a low one with the general similarity of the procedure.
With a high dubbing, the initiative comes from above, the feudal lords select oprichniks, officials, with a low double, conditional fish sweep away the system. A low double will always be weak and flawed, because it has nothing but desires. These are the same fanatics zerefs. (Look around. Who shouts "kazaksha soyle" (speak by kazakh) the most? These people want a low take. To replace professionals in all spheres, to amuse their self-esteem, to enrich themselves, but this is not beneficial to the Kazakh people themselves) The conservative people after the revolution, that is, after the bifurcation, will still return to the upper dubbing. So Russian communism ended by Stalin and his people. Very mediocre people – all the older children of Russian peasants turned into the red elite, but they never got rid of the inferiority complex: they carried their dirt in genetics until they abolished all red hypocrisy in 1991. A low dubbing is always a failure of people's memory and practice. It's just timelessness and the absence of a real natural elite. Who feeds the modern fanatics and scammers so that they scream the loudest? Yes, we should never forget: if you don't see the elite at home, your own elite, then someone else's, external elite is working. She will support the lower double of the aul revolutionaries in order to destroy the people, in any case, for a long time to take all the resources and admire the Kazakh singers and boxers to the cheers of the narrow-minded philistines. Because non-professionals will always carry inferiority complexes, but at the same time they will always shout the loudest)
So.
The upper double is the most basic in human practice, because the rabble never has the knowledge of priests, and in general, the egg does not teach the chicken.
Of the Japanese, Arabs and Turks, it is the Turks who have kept their double the most, so they have the best prospects.
The upper double is divided under external indirect control. This is when the elite seems to be national, but it is controlled from outside at least by economic, financial laws. Outwardly successful Saudis fall into this canvas. The Saudis are thriving because no one has shot Arab princes. This prosperity of the Emirates drives the Kazakh longing for their own pre-revolutionary bais (feodal rich men). I repeat. With a low red double, the feudal elite is not able to survive, because this is a revolution, a popular uprising (and no rich Kazakh is willing to voluntarily give a place of honor to another Kazakh even now. Kazakhs do not have strategic cooperation because of this. Every Kazakh sells and buys everything now. Yes, modern Kazakhs are now repeating Western practice. But any new rich "Kazakh" from the mud will behave exactly the same as his predecessor – Kazakh feodal buy. This indicates a persistent low, tribal reflection. Any modern Kazakh can be thrown into the past and he will not be lost there, and vice versa: any Kazakh from the past can be thrown into our time and changed – no one will notice the substitution. Kazakhs with a lag of 500 years are identical cultural twins. And this despite the fact that three generations of Kazakhs were educated by the Bolsheviks).
Despite the Japanese miracle, the Japanese are also in a state of groggy. Kazakhs would dream of the level of the Japanese, but the Kazakhs did not even pass the Japanese stage of Kamakura and Muromachi: this is when the Japanese samurai got tired of their own slaughter and recognized the power of the shogun. Kazakh philistines are so fucked up that they want democracy right away… And this is despite the fact that every Kazakh is the same Kazakh from the 500-year-old past, overflowing with ambitions and not wanting strategic cooperation, that is, not having high reflection.
Chapter 9
Turks and Kazakhs
In 545, the union of tribes that came out of Altai defeated the people of the Zhuzhans, their patrons, and ten years later they captured Sogd. In 575, the Göktürks, we are talking about the Turkics, already controlled the Northern Black Sea region, the Crimea and the North Caucasus, that is, in 30 years, the Göktürks passed and began to control the entire steppe zone from the Crimea to Manchuria. How could this happen? The seizure of territories so unimaginable in size in such a short period of time. In 555, that is, ten years after they left the Altai, they had already reached the Volga and controlled Transoxiana. Yes, the Göktürks forged iron for the Zhuzhans. But this is not the most important thing. Iron has nothing to do with it. They defeated the Ephthalites, that is, the ancestors of those very Parthian cataphractaries.
Since the 6th century, the displacement of the Iranian root from the entire steppe and its replacement with the Turkic one began. No one can explain why the ancient Iranian nomads ceded the entire steppe to the Turks. Since then, many Iranians have renounced and continued the glory of the Iranian conquerors under the name of Oghuz. The former Iranians, under the name of the Seljuks, created the «South Asian way» towards Europe – not as fast as the Turkites, but in 500 years they reached Vienna under the name of the Ottomans. What happened to the ancient Iranians that they gave way to the Turks, moreover, they renounced so much that they fought with other descendants of the Aryans in Iran and in Azerbaijan. These ancient Iranians were known to the world by various names – Saks, Massagets, Sarmatians. These ancient Iranians also lived in the Turfan oasis by right of the indigenous inhabitants. The modern descendants of these ancient Iranians, the Uighurs, will not let you lie. But the Uighurs also speak the Turkic language. After all, the ancient Iranians were known to the ancient Chinese under the name Yueji. How many descendants of ancient Iranians turned into Turks – millions! All these tribes of ancient Iranians spoke different dialects of the Proto-Iranian language. But these ancient Iranians fought with each other, like the Mongols before Genghis Khan, like Kazakh tribes before the arrival of the Russians, but the Mongolian and Kazakh eternal showdowns are pathetic copies of the ancient Iranian thousand – year showdowns (the Mongols, by the way, could not impose the Mongolian language on the conquered world, although they followed the same route). What can I say: the worst enemies, Cyrus of Persia and the queen of the Massagets Tomiris in 530 BC could talk to each other, most likely without translators. The Parthians took power from the Persians in Central Asia. The antagonism of Iran and Turan is not an Iranian-Turkic antagonism. These are the ancient Iranians who fought with each other for a thousand years. Today, only Shiite Iran is the heir of all the once glorious ancient Iranians, bringing diversity to the motley Islamic world. What happened to the ancient Iranians that they turned into Turks and changed their faith?
There are a whole complex of reasons for this historical defeat of the ancient Iranians. But the most important reason is the inability to cooperate strategically. All people with a tribal code, not even a culture, are not capable of strategic cooperation. To put it even more simply, hostility at the level of one’s own small piece of land, a local territory that has received a pathetic extension called homeland. For worms the shit is housing, for whom and the swamp is the place of birth. But the inhabitants of one village can challenge the inhabitants of a neighboring village to a fist fight – there was such fun in Russia. In Soviet cities, it was fraught for young people to walk through a strange area. The bloody showdowns of teenage gang fights are mini copies of zeref reflection. Here, the «protected area» is only as an excuse to demonstrate the power. Before the activity of Genghis Khan, the Mongols attacked and slaughtered each other. The Merkits took Genghis Khan’s wife after the raid. Then he returned her with the help of Anda Jamukha with a «Merkit gift». His first son Jochi was always called that behind his back
The Turkits in the middle of the 6th century passed these steppes in ten years simply because the whole steppe was a sparsely populated territory. This is a territory drained of simple living conditions. No one needs it except nomads (without the arrival of any civilizers, no steppes can be populated by other people, and the people who lead a nomadic economy will never refuse to do something else: they will be stubborn, they will run the old economy – they will remain in exactly the same warriors number. Without the arrival of «colonialists», the men with cultural of trade, the people cannot grow from the word in any way: new technologies are needed, especially new thinking, the ability to strategic cooperation. Therefore, all reformers apply radical measures of «re-education». Nomadic people, especially the elite the tribal elite of nomads will never abandon the «wills of their ancestors») One skirmish with the Eftalites was enough for turkits to disperse the other tribes into corners.
Ten years later, the Turkits began fighting over the inheritance because tribal thinking is the eternal ambitions of the discontented (The first to rise was the rootless Apa Khan Temeren, the rootless son of a concubine. It was only with the help of the Chinese that the uprising was suppressed). But already in 603, the Turkic ale, the empire of the Turks was divided into Western and Eastern khaganates. In 744, the Eastern Khaganate fell under the onslaught of the Uighurs. How long, it turns out, did the Turks dominate? Almost 200 years. But the Uighurs themselves already spoke the Turkic language. And the entire Iranian Maveronnahr spoke the Turkic language. Deep cultural reforms have taken place over 200 years. (Before the Tokugawa Shogunate, the ancient inhabitants of Hokkaido, the Ainu had a European appearance. Tokugawa Izyasu ordered the Ainu to be settled throughout Japan. Modern Ainu look no different from the Japanese. But the residents of Bukhara, Khorezm, Samarkand still resemble Iranians. But they speak the Turkic language because the inhabitants of the Chagatai ulus were not forcibly resettled anywhere, and the Mongols were not imported. Interestingly, most modern Kyrgyz have Aryan R1a, but they look like Mongols. Did the ancient Iranians marry Mongolian women? When did this happen? This is not a question on our topic)
PS. When I ask a Kazakh to take my book, do I have nothing to do? No, I have something to show. I need to show Kazakh ambitions. Even the most poor, insignificant Kazakh has them. It is important for me to show inability to cooperate strategically. Kazakhs are solidifying so far at the family level. Even in business, the first thought of a Kazakh is to please his family and himself, to show success to his relatives. Hence all the show-off. All the «guests» notice not the such friendship of the Kazakhs. And they use it well. For Kazakhs, disassembly among themselves is more important. When a dignitary Kazakh is in power, has access to a feeder, he will not greet a dissident. When a dignitary Kazakh is removed from office, he even hugs you. But if the Kazakh is brought back to power again, he will again behave arrogantly, again pretend that he does not know you – no matter what happens.
Chapter 10
The strength of blood and the weakness of strength
The inability to strategic cooperation pursued all the peoples of the blood, including those who lived up to world democracy, or with the most extreme new hypocrisy like of the folks of money. There were moments when the peoples of blood, especially in the form of nomads, created world history. As a rule, nature was to blame for everything. (When the peoples of the blood are well, that is, satisfying, they are not capable of anything. Just about this time, the talkers of modernity like to rant: nomads, they say, contemplators of nature, such total democrats, who do not offend any divine creature. Just the nomads were fierce beasts. They even hated each other – raided, robbed, killed. Ashin’s men beat the Yuejas. Yuezhi renounced, turned into Chateau Turks, that is, Oguzes. The Oguzes engaged in the genocide of exactly the same Oguzes, known in Russia as the Pechenegs. Another tribe of Turks, from the abandoned tribes, under the name of Cumans -Cumans, engaged in the genocide of the Pechenegs until they were completely overtaken and destroyed. After the Pechenegs, it was the turn of the Cumans – Kipchaks themselves. The Mongols (apparently also Turks) of Genghis Khan drove the Kipchaks to Pannonia. There are thousands of such examples. Everywhere, even in Eurasia, even in South and North America, even in modern Africa, there are always some Bhutus who cut Tutsis). And this is always explained by the inability of the peoples of the blood to coexist otherwise than by blood. (The Romans could not defend themselves from the hordes of Attila, too large an area would have to be fenced off like the Great Wall of China. But all de against the Picts they built their ramparts in Britain). And if peoples live by blood, that is, by kinship, then they are a priori not capable of a long peace, according to revkon, it means strategic cooperation (even easier, such people do not trust, dislike, compete and envy).
Civilization, as a derivative of a long history and a long policy, makes its own adjustments to this communication. People of blood live quietly and peacefully for the time being. Civilizational mechanisms restrict tribal people from conflicts, inhibit them from genetic outbreaks – these peoples seem to be floating in the mainstream of events with their hands tied. But people of blood, people of kinship still do not want to cooperate, prefer to communicate with relatives, and not only to perform rituals, including at the highest level – at the state level. You should understand that if people remember their families, it means they are incapable of state management, that is, they will not pick up talents, they will pick up the most talented relatives, and this narrows the base of the nation (let’s call a similar chimera floating in the channel that way, because there are no other names. They’ll tell me, are we the only ones? Yes, you’re right. You are not alone, there are many similar peoples and states living by the voice of blood with a gag of civilization in their mouths. Yes, what can I say, the Japanese draw the emblems of their company on kimonos, and Japanese firms were created according to the clan-family principle – they imitate the samurai tradition. There used to be family hieroglyphs on the kimono. This Kazakh habit of not noticing, passing by, if this Kazakh is an official, or the editor feeds the family on the trust of the authorities. And our power is also tied to the family. The family-state in our country is not figuratively, but literally. We all walk around with the gags of civilization and squint our eyes, narrow them, smile, throw dirt behind our eyes. If you are outside the Horde, then you are dangerous… to family prosperity. Every Kazakh in a European costume is therefore comical, if you look at his translational fluorography – not external, everything is fine with the costume, gait, but hidden, invisible, everything falls into place).
These are the rudiments of a consanguineous world when everyone was equal. There was no early feudal dictate of property on relationships yet. This will eventually develop the feudal dictate of the elite. But it won’t be just the voice of blood anymore. The voice of blood will have to go around the land hills. The feudal dictatorship is already the dictate of the land, not blood in its purest form. All the peoples who were engaged in agriculture quickly moved to such cooperation between the elite and the common people. They made their way into the traditional elite, into the aristocracy by talents. Nobility in the form of constancy of actions – the actions of several members of the dynasty are required for the family «handwriting». A settled system can include as many options for cooperation, including the voice of blood, but in this case, the blood cools down all the time. The logical constructions of the cold mind begin to impose the first node on the blood. When necessary, the principle of kinship is included, mainly for the political purposes of the strategy. The feudal society differs from the barbaric one in that the elite assumes strategic cooperation. All unions begin to take shape in the form of dynastic marriages (A simple person thinks that shezhire protects against incest so that the people consist of healthy warriors – this is a stereotype of the common people). Dynastic marriages are necessary for long-term power. (If you see a «blind», that is, a hypocrite savage editor passing by, he also adheres to this line. He cannot, is not capable of strategic cooperation. Therefore, the entire information strategy in such a world is supported by people of the philosophy of culture of money. They love such situations and of course no one has canceled the money yet).
But why did the nomads «chase» all the farmers, starting from the farmers of the Nile Valley and ending with the Yuezhs of Sogd? For the joy of stupid patriots. And this is despite the fact that the culture of money is dominant today, using all the stupid cries for controlled chaos.
Chapter 11
Free riders are still riding
It is very difficult to rise, to break into leaders or into the elite in a society of people with a thin cortex, and that’s why. It is in cortex, and that’s why that all the connections and the memory of actions are formed – in the human brain, in the cerebral cortex, there is a socialization of the entire experience.
A tribal society is a community of equal envious «communists» watching each other. No wonder (the Communists of Stalin system followed it and created arbitrariness – these are genes, not an idea). Because of the primitive of such communism, each of the «equals» was on his mind, this affected the fate of official communism, which officially disappeared in 1991 (they are still on their mind: someone in memory of Soviet communism performs well – these are artists, such as the Communist Party In Russia, and the so-called The Kazakh People’s Party. Who else? Who thinks of themselves as leaders-activists in social networks, although they should shut up and look for the best, and not offer themselves weak. Idiots, calm down!) if you are seen as an equal, no one will allow you to be at the top. If you were an equal among your peers, you just won’t be forgiven for it. You don’t even need a contract of equals to do this. There are still such «equals», there are many of them. This equality is absolutely immaterial. This equality of the soul is an echo of primitive equality and rivalry at the same time. Now it is still the greedy equality of the savages of democracy, but no one knows about it. Everyone knows that tradition loves the humble, that’s all. All conservative peoples have atavisms of primitive communism and modesty is its own daughter. This daughter is now being used in a brothel with the sign «Democracy». But all, almost all conservative nations in the person of the representative persons of the elite do not seem to notice this. And where the official elite goes, the whole herd goes. In fact, this egoism of savages is actively used by the so-called democracy, when the habits of savages, savage hacks are taken under control. But savages – absolutely literate today, absolutely consciously – voluntarily go into bondage, like the same Indians who did not know what kind of beads the Columbus sailors gave them… Obeying their instincts, the elite hid a lot of money – part of the common spoils of the whole people: no one will forgive them for this betrayal. Although, perhaps, at this moment people are fawning over this government, which means they want to get something else. The fact that it is easy to take savages through the bribery of elites, it has long become clear. But before that, these elites achieved their elevation. The very height where envy, jealousy and stones no longer fall. Stones will fly to corrupt officials later. This guaranteed curse has been retroactively recorded more than once by events. Civilization and democracy have made savages weak.
If these elites have achieved their indisputability, this is another stage.
These same conservative peoples have strict rules of hierarchy. Hierarchy restrains the natural egoism, anarchy, freedom and pseudo-communism of every savage. Savages could not forgive each other’s talents, civilization had taught them that. But before that, jealousy and envy were controlled only by the Asian dictatorship. Dictators or feudal elite have taken all instincts under control. And democracy accuses savages today that they have not fully revealed themselves, that they are ashamed of their inner forces in order not to be shy and throw off their rulers. The financiers of the world bank tell them: Personalities (savages)! Free yourself from your elite, from autocracy – so they are being told from across the ocean, and Soros’ people, who receives money from Soros funds agree like parrots and monkeys. But this means that primitive communism is coming again, jealousy and envy of all against all, that is, civil war. Conservative people do not need to be taught, they are so «personalities by nature», free personalities, each by himself, free riders – not knowing that people of money will come up with this for themselves. But people of money are people of deep strategy among a similar rabble. These tradesmen have learned to create workshops, unions, unions of entrepreneurs, etc. You don’t have to do anything, and you are a person! Just trade. Before appearing as a modern world mafia, an international force, the Refags went a long way of community, that is, friendship of the rootless and hungry in the slums of vagrants and in the garbage streets, who learned to be friends with a distant goal, which they did not know about then. These vagabonds today control genetic warriors who continue their feud. These people, in the form of financiers, control the whole world. There are still islands of conservative resistance.
Then we can say that all nomads are individuals without money. Just were wild people without money. They don’t like it when an equal simply outranks them on an invisible horse. They know who is who among themselves. This is the primal pride of jerks, which does not allow the cortex to thicken, does not allow the creation of alliances, except for dynasties, except for the contract of the elite. It does not give a reason for strategic cooperation, except for a war-fight. It is necessary to jump to top so that the envy and the running boards of the brothers – friends of the «savages» could no longer reach. It’s pointless to shit if you can’t get result. This is a human expectation, and an eternal one, that «Akela will old», the materialist theory explains the appearance of classes, in our case, the landed aristocracy, the growth of technology and technology, the appearance of surpluses. This violates the primal harmony of equality, the attraction of blood, egoism-the anarchy of horsemen. If I’m not the first, you won’t be either! So unconsciously all the savages of the world still think, but they do not know about these secrets of their soul, they just do it. Every conservative nation has its own way. How they got gagged, how their hands were tied, each such people has its own scores with civilization.
The aristocracy itself is separated from relatives, so it is separated from the guardianship and egoism of equal zerefs. The aristocracy has been teaching conditionally related «hyenas» for a long time that there can be no former equality. It takes on the function of noble control, if necessary, provides, makes allowances, frees poor relatives, takes on the function of patrons. (It is still possible to observe the release of the law of the «lord’s shoulder» and other benefits on behalf of some local leader, this lyne is repeated by smaller government officials, which, they say, they decided, they grant the benefits for the poor). Thank you, my dears, I’ve had enough of equality, so I’ve had enough of the accompanying jealousy. From now on, I’m not unequal to you, get used to it. I’m an aristocrat, I’m taller than you, freaks. The word freaks does not sound at this moment, but every dictator works as if he curses everyone and takes revenge. That’s what it is, not the surplus obtained by an iron plow. Although formally, it is the iron plow that is guilty – it has strengthened, strengthened the sense of superiority. There is no turning back.
Chapter 12
How the Seljuk Turks appeared on the historical scene
Brothers by faith to replace brothers by blood. What’s important here.
