скачать книгу бесплатно
Autocracy vs. fake
Almaz Braev
The author is not against democracy. Just-auto believes that the traditional people it is contraindicated, all at once. All at once, it will just lead to irreversible tragic consequences. And in portions, dosed together with the change of generations, everything is possible. Moreover, they want it so much, but who?
Autocracy vs. fake
Almaz Braev
© Almaz Braev, 2022
ISBN 978-5-0051-8362-0
Created with Ridero smart publishing system
Introduction
Paternalism
There is a direct dependence of population multiplication on the essence of the ruler. Traditional peoples grow in number under a strong ruler. Traditional people wait for a hard, strict hand, as children wait for an authoritative father. Just as if the family had a strict father. The steppe bore fruit under dictators, and under Democrats, it would collapse into internecine strife and cease to multiply.
We are a traditional people. We need guarantees of order. We need an authoritative leader.
If your people are not ready for democracy, then maintain the existing order.
The Republic of Kazakhstan should have strict Executive power.
Today, even the corrupt authorities fulfill this task. Here the question is, what is not corruption in the East? And what is good for the East, and what is bad for the West? Replacing corrupt Eastern officials with other Eastern “non-corrupt” ones will do nothing. Revolutionaries and new officials will also turn into corrupt officials after a while because they have relatives. And Eastern culture reproduces hierarchy all the time. This is why all the CIS republics have received traditionalists in power since 1991, even if these traditionalists always talk about their commitment to democratic values and open society in the future. All these people were born in the East anyway. For traditionalists who are born in the East, first, their personal status and… of course, wealth are important. If the people are 90% traditionalists, even to some extent literate and educated, every next traditionalist in power will inevitably think about their status and wealth. Thus, replacing the humble corrupt officials with the noisy patriots will also do nothing. The Republic of Kazakhstan should have a strong Executive power. Even the so-called dishonest Executive power is better than the Maidan. Although in an exceptional case, it is better to be honest, of course. But this must be earned. “Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country”.
Chapter I
East without sun
“East is East and West is West and they can’t come together”
R. Kipling
Steppe Eurasia will never be liberal because the main occupation of nomads is nomadism and the struggle (war) for new nomads earth. But not trade. This has been the case for centuries, at any rate. This is culture. The European model that attracts our young bourgeoisie through the soft power and influence of Europe was formed at least two centuries ago, very far from the steppe expanses. After at least eight generations of social and cultural evolution, Europeans have become today’s Europeans.
Is this why our bourgeoisie is evil, greedy, insatiable, self-satisfied, vain, wild, and ostentatious? Because it’s first—generation? This applies to everyone, from top to bottom, from oligarchs to hawkers. Almost totally. Even the rules of decency were instilled not by Europeans but by Soviet institutions of culture and education. That is why it is unclear who is trading, what is trading, and why. It’s clear why. The rest is ostentation and imitation, imitation and ostentation, other monkey antics about democracy on the highest and lowest branches of the system it shows our complexes more than self-respect. What’s the first thing needs us, if not self-respect? (Don’t tell me that self-respect can be achieved only by dressing up in tailcoats or, conversely, in folk dressing gowns on holidays, or even by changing from a Russian Lada to a German Mercedes).
Liberalism passed quickly, but only as an economic scheme when it was necessary to register the inheritance and property of the USSR. All infrastructure and resources should be privatized and taken into their hands. Here, the market certainly helped to do this. There is nothing further to imitate. The government put everything in the hands of tame oligarchs and got rich. Only the demagoguery and groups of human rights defenders played in democracy. As soon as there were not enough distribution resources, conflicts immediately arose at the very top (or will inevitably arise – A. B.) At the top got rid of the disgraced oligarchs. All the opposition members are former high-ranking officials. Now the funds of distribution and liberalism (and therefore freedom) have shrunk even more. There was nothing more to divide and sell generally. That is why everywhere in the former Soviet Union, there were shouts and resistance from small opposition groups, shouts of small-scale oppositionists. Overturned oligarchs hired unemployed people, among whom there were outright psychos. The overturned oligarchs showed the whole world how the police persecuted and even beat these unfortunate people. Democracy is being beaten! In fact, they were deeply indifferent to the fate of these people. The main thing was to portray their former colleague as a radical autocrat.
Therefore, the next station is a selection from “corrupt officials” the money and transfer to their “oppositionists”, and in another way, it means Maidan?
Here again, the East will take its course, and other clans of no less, and perhaps more greedy parasites will appear. No Eastern person in the liberal trend will be a citizen, except for the status of the very first parasite. This must be remembered. In any case, this is what these “oppositionists” will say about him. This is not just our upbringing, but our culture, and who did not have time, then immediately – the oppositionist, just an Allergy to freedom for all Eastern people – manifests itself in this way. The more they talk about freedom in the steppe, the wider and thicker the noose around the neck of all other unfree people. Because we are incapable of democracy right away, Revcon suggests that we prepare for at least a limited treaty model. Revcon will prepare people for the Treaty-based on Eastern interests. Revcon will train a leader who everyone will imitate, including people infected with easy money from the first stream (the bourgeoisie). If there is no long-term urbanization in terms of trade, then the population will only imitate the idol. There is no real leader yet. Let’s draw together this desired leader.
Chapter II
What is our strength
Is our strength in our cultural squalor?
Part 1. External signs of conservatism
Why there is no democracy in a post-traditional society. Why can't build a democracy.
Because traditional people live in a traditional society. There is:
1. Fight for a place. In the traditional world, you need to fight for a place of grace.
Because in a traditional society, the main task is to get out in the people, take the place of honor and hold on to the place of honor as long as possible.
Indirect signs of this behavior.
No boss or VIP person wants to free up space in the chief’s chair in any way. From the outside, this can be seen well to the point of surprise. As in such a society, the entire nation ages along with a certain group of elites. If this is a chief, then the time is determined by the era of this leader. Together with the leader, the same politicians (whom the leader has designated as “politicians”) age long and persistently and do not want to resign. The same public figures loom playing and do not disconnect from the public. The same writers write books about the leader and his politicians. The same announcers report what politicians did today, what politicians did yesterday, and what they will do again – usually in bright colors. Or what the court poets write, what court composers play marches, what part of the unearthly origin was found on the leader’s body by the same philosophers.
Oppositionists talk about the cult; singers sing odes to everyone at once and to themselves, of course, at the same time. Even pop singers want to avoid disappearing from the airwaves. They also sing on Patriotic themes during the breaks of pop concerts. The feeling that in a traditional society, literally, everyone comes forward with their feet as imitating the first person? (The expression “forward feet” means that the person is carried out through the door when he takes the horizontal position of the corpse).
The entire population steps forward in feet.
The tradition of going forward with your feet is total everywhere. If the idols of society can't stand it, they will be thrown off, removed from work, by competitors, or they will leave themselves, then they know and everyone knows that no one needs them from that moment, if they actually leave. In fact, from now on, he is no one – not a boss, not a sage, not a philosopher, not a singer at all. No one to sing about, no one to praise, no one to suck up to. Everyone forgets him and passes by, and even excellent friends stop saying Hello. This encourages bosses, worthless politicians, and mediocre singers to sit until the end. Until they are actually literally carried out feet first out of the office.
2. Everyone is busy looking for a reliable host. This is protection from other robbers. "Roof".
People who do not fall into the category of respected, the stars, VIP authorities are always looking for such authorities to hide under their authority. And they want to tell everyone that he is my relative, my friend, he is my idol, and I love and respect him very much. I love him for life. Although love is certainly artificial in a competitive environment of fanatics without a direct relationship, the only way to stand out is to confess unlimited love. Hence, the potential accumulation of the cult of each first authority. I'm not even talking about the government, about the people in power, about the leader. Everyone can see it. This is all clear to everyone. The leader is simply doomed to popular love and adoration. At the bottom, at the very end of the pyramid, everyone is not interested and despised by everyone.
The leader has the biggest cult potential.
Everyone will confess their love, and others are afraid that not confessing is a crime. If the leader notices that someone does not show active love or the enemies inform him about the unlucky man, he is finished in terms of his career. Not literal. It’s about a career. Along with the market, the love of authority will also grow strongly. The cult will also grow. The field of authority is narrowed to a handful of people and one leader figure for the specific goals of each “loving” without looking back. Thus, the meaning of work is not the work itself, not the profession or professionalism, but the expression of love and devotion. Loyalty becomes a mandatory job. Even corrupt criminal offenses are forgiven for loyalty. The category outside the chosen circle and the chosen circle itself is in an eternal search for cover – a roof in a modern way. The father of nations inevitably becomes the greatest protection of the entire nation.
Chapter III
Who are the judges?
When the barbarians took Rome, they could only plunder and kill. Robbers and murderers were not responsible and could not answer for their crimes.
Who are the judges?
The sacred innovation of the times of the bloody Romanov monarchy gets new colors here. Judges are only descendants, and the judge is history. For contemporaries, if they are new Romans, then woe to the vanquished at once; if they are new barbarians, then barbarians are supposed to plunder and bring booty to the family. Barbarian’s family will not condemn him but will support him. Therefore, the barbarian carries everything into the house.
Ideologists of liberalism claim that if all Zerefs (traditional people) are given property, they will automatically become responsible. So responsible that they will eventually demand democratic governance and root out corruption. Is it true?
But what we see.
We see that the Zerefs are getting rich and don’t want to be responsible for anything. On the contrary, they carry everything to the family and build large houses (almost castles) for the family. What happens on the street the corruption and despotism of any kind; they don’t care, as long as to make the family feel good, they are not interested in anything else. On the contrary, any boss and corrupt official causes traditional people to understand: an official, a despot, and even a “tyrant” in his workplace does everything for the family. In fact, any Zeref in his place would do the same. And to infinity. Why is it that someone else is surprised that nothing will happen to big corrupt officials; they will not be convicted but amnestied? Answer. They carry everything to the family. What questions can there be? Does no one directly or indirectly condemn theirs? From the point of view of tradition and the depth of centuries, this is all normal. Who will bring the most to the grotto, the same, the most beloved?
Who condemns indirectly?
Who might have forgotten about their family? Or maybe he compares someone else’s family and someone else’s fate? I suspect that the comparison has the appearance of simple greed; otherwise, there are no other motives in the tradition. An indirect denouncement of a corrupt official could write only weak warriors and nothing more. He’s weak, and he’s jealous. He didn’t bring anything to the grotto.
Here are some examples.
When the barbarians sacked Rome, and the Romans fled, the eternal city seemed to disappear after the plunder. What was recently, but it immediately disappeared. What used to be called Rome turned into a gothic village with the same gothic name. How and how was it possible to unite the gothic shepherds, who, before the capture of Rome and its plunder, grazed cattle with the natives? Some knew the law, and others didn’t.
What is the law of the barbarians?
The barbarian must know that each of his actions will be appreciated by his clan, so the barbarian is generous and sympathetic, but not to strangers, but only to the people of his clan (that is, to his relatives). The most authoritative leader is the one who gives away makes gifts to the people. (In Saudi Arabia, sheikhs still do this – they give out gifts, as the ancient sheikhs did 1000 years ago. But the sheikhs are very civilized people)
Where did the castle come from in the Middle Ages? They didn’t exist before.
If so happened, the barbarians (Goths and Vandals, Alans, Huns) scattered across the free land, where the former owners escaped. What should they do? Who should they answer to? After all, the Romans were not there. So, the barbarian will not answer to anyone, he is his master, and all the loot will be put in one place. To protect yourself from other barbarians just like him, he built an impregnable fortress, dug a moat, and let the river into the moat – here you have a medieval castle – fortress. (Have you noticed such locks now? I see. Although in the yard of the XXI century)
No relatives and no judges. There are no judges, so everyone now judges. They can trample everyone under their horse (now under cars), or they can ride anywhere they want. Who would they answer to? In front of those who think to take everything to the family? Yes, they are the same as them, only they do not have a horse and a castle (mansion, account, car Park). This is how traditional people learn to co-exist in the new Middle Ages, which they create as if reluctantly. Anyone who wants protection must work for the owner, who will launch it into their feudal castle. Those who do not want protection will go without a roof or protection. Traditional people are the sources of their own medieval troubles. The Middle Ages come precisely and invisibly, while some fighters against corruption will build a democracy. After the fall of Rome, there was no democracy for more than 1,000 years. Even if the fighters build a democracy themselves or thanks to the West, it will still be a castle with new vassals and feudal lords. It’s always been that way. In medieval castles, this is evidence of the lack of ideas and any responsibility.
Chapter IV
When the oppositionist is worse the official
Friendship against the blood.
Where the dictatorship comes from and where it leads.
The traditional elite could always stand out and separate themselves from the rest of the crowd. At first, the crowd was understood as the inhabitants of one village and numerous close and distant relatives, then all the rootless and conquered peoples. And the family law required everyone to take care of their blood. The Patriarchal elite was also to take care of the people. They could not and did not think of any other way to live. Any such village was a collective of mutual assistance and mutual support. This picture is still the same among the people of the tradition.
Probably, there comes a time when such care begins to strain the upper classes. Can someone stand high above others, or can’t possibly protect others and feed them? Each case requires specific lighting. Maybe the relatives themselves have become lazy, they don’t want to go to war for the leader because conquests are always trophies for everyone, or maybe they don’t even want to work. In addition, there are always competitors among relatives. Sometimes even the most half-brothers and close relatives became bitter enemies; there are a thousand examples of this, especially when it was necessary to share power and inheritance. In General, we will assume that some elite wants to separate from their relatives so that everyone can clearly see that they are the elite. They say we are all noble people, maybe even from the same village, maybe blood brothers, citizens of the same state, and we certainly want to get the most.
These two tendencies of fraternal hypocrisy and the immediate struggle for absolute power cannot be taken away. It is not immediately visible, and it is not even clear what is really more important. On the one hand, all people from the periphery show at feasts that they are very close, irreplaceable as the real relatives; on the other side, there is no competition eviler than competition within this very family and this very circle. The same situation is possible at the very top. On the one side, the traditional government presses on kinship that we are one people, they say, one country. However, it seems to these people that people from outside, strangers, people in power would be less greedy than their own. It turns out that it is better for a conditional brother to be friends or, more precisely, to be in an alliance with a stranger by blood and for a people with a seemingly strange people at first glance. This has nothing to do with blood or the obligation to yield to an older person in the hierarchy with the main credo you are for me, and I am for you. And all the rest is the accompanying hypocrisy. It is clear that if you can do for me, I do for you.
Why are people of the same blood, the same tribe, and the same culture so despotic towards their people? For example, the bankers with their Draconian interest rates.
Reason №1.
A radical desire to stand out and rise above everyone, most of all, is characteristic of outcasts. The first passion is the passion for proving and taking revenge. If some people searching for terrible energy find the answer in Gumilyov’s passionarity, then they are mistaken, and the tale of sub-passionaries will not help them. All the time to look for energy in people because somewhere a crack has formed in the earth’s crust, it is, at least, ridiculous. Only the two-color tribal soul, the existence in the world of sharp categories of good-bad, friend – enemy you can find the answer, why if something is denied, then obviously, if something is repelled, then very roughly. Elite means the elite. To push so hard, this is a world of contrasts and pressures.
The imposition of kinship together with responsibility for the crowd, then a sharp denial, creates the phenomenon of feudal domination or repulsion. From the opposite: for – against, no – yes, brother – stranger, and so on. This world is two-colored. Related people during the crisis may be a narrowing of the area due to the defeat, narrowing of borders, but they want to sharply separate themselves in their homes. The upper classes and feudal lords hide from their enemies in feudal castles all the time. Officials hide behind laws that protect them, like the walls of a fortress—officials above the law. Well, in castles, too.
Down with the relationship!
But the elite can also stand out from a series of victories. This is the vertigo of the traditional elite. They will want to fence themselves off from people and leave only the household and loyal servants. This dog-like loyal household is a very characteristic accompaniment of feudalism. Under the monarchy, all the rooms are packed with servants. If some blood-related group wants to say something, comes with a contender for the chair, it will mean a war of competitors. But if it is necessary to resist other people, then the closest circle can play the role of a friend, although relatives or friends can play for themselves. In any case, one day there will be a desire for undivided total domination of the allies. If the traditional culture remains the main one in this area, then every such feudal leader will strive to eliminate any competitors, no matter what it takes. (This was, even when the Soviet people were present as a phenomenon of comradely proletarian solidarity in international expansion. The repression was evidence of this).
There will be reminders that we are one people, one family, one country. And at this very time, people will always feel that something very heavy is pressing down from above and pressing on their backs. Oddly enough, the same old feudal boot presses on one family, one nation, one country; it is the leader's boot and his court servants. In any case, the one who is a brother or is considered a brother and "one people" presses and presses along with other people's sons in the literal sense. These very sons literally came out of the people from their very depths and niches. All the court servants in their highly polished boots guard the secret of this origin.
So, it turns out that the clan itself, or the people, or the Union of tribes chooses or tries to select from themselves not the noblest, but the most passionate. And for proving their superiority, the boots of the new rulers, who are considered brothers, become heavier and heavier. Despotic phenomena are growing. The traditional elite pupates into a narrow and hateful (or at least unpleasant) circle of fraternal luxury shoes. And this is not one and not a particular phenomenon. This is the system. This is the culture. I'm the boss, and you're nobody.
So, what happens? We just need to let them calm down.
It is necessary to give such supreme relatives a chance to calm down. Make it clear that yes, we as the people recognize them as the elite, elected persons, and authorized heirs of the bluest blood that we don't claim their places of honor. Let them have fun in their high palace. We do not impose on them as relatives and do not want to add to the court staff. However, these bosses love loyal people like dogs. Who wants success? Let them make a loyal appearance. The contradiction of the traditional people can be solved very simply. So, that other "relatives" do not look as a friend, and then a prop for a riot in the neighbors, the opposition and the violators of the brotherhood should be outlawed. Those who oppose the feudal elite cause chaos. They want to catch a fish in muddy water. And in general, dogs are better than oppositionists.
Reason №2
That post-kin people don’t know what friendship is, but they know what kinship is, we already know. Friendship is a soft phenomenon outside the generic hard field and categorical: friend – stranger, friend-enemy, good – bad. Therefore, generic or post-generic fiction always strives to get away from the rigid coupling with relatives, to show who I am and who you are. Those who did not know friendship and did not know love always want to strengthen the lack of friendship, with relatives or people, there is no difference. Where there are people in General, friendship always comes first. Friendship or solidarity of rulers and so-called citizens. But where there are no citizens, simply because there is no friendship, but there is a blood relationship or post-relationship, as you want to call it, in general, there are no people who are friends with each other, there will be orders and dictates. You can’t make friends with your family. Then they will come and do nothing. Everyone will become idlers. All will come to rule and enrich themselves with their brothers, their relatives near and far. Others who are not directly related will insist that they are one people: “Ruler, why are you offending us?”
And who is going to work? Most importantly, physical labor immediately becomes much of the lower classes, almost slaves. This is a different question, who works and who only eats.
Chapter V
You are a person!
The propaganda, you are a person. Where is it from? Why does the Eurasian understanding of the personality of a warrior hero and a convinced prophet and citizen differ from the merchant’s desire? To please whom? The hero wants to win, and the merchant wants to please.
The merchant does not care who is in front of him, and his main desire is to sell his goods. Because of this, he will praise the freak like beautiful, the dullard that he is cool, the upstart that he is serious, and so on. If he buys a product, item, and clothing in a merchant shop, he will leave very satisfied with himself. And the seller will forget this “person”.
The European identity and human rights were born in the market, and the Eurasian hero and fighter in a fight, in the struggle.
That’s why there is such a discrepancy. But European flattery is certainly close to a weak person, but proud. Many traditional people are very susceptible to flattery. Just take them with your bare hands after a couple of compliments. The European personality is picked up for free and went for a walk. And not just like that, but in front of everyone. Therefore, the European personality has an element of show, ostentation, speculation, hypocrisy, and all that is not liked in the Eurasian one. Isn’t that why the vanguard of “personalities” are perverts, psychopaths, moral freaks, vagabonds who received free money (maybe oppositionists), and they went berserk? If a person is also paid for, what kind of person is it? We are not talking about all Europeans. Most of them are decent normal people. We’re talking about images. What do people of traditional culture notice first of all in modern Europe and emphasize these qualities?
Market modern “personalities,” of course, like people with money. This is not necessarily the oligarchs, but the oligarchs in the first place. Market personalities scold corrupt officials. But not because they stole, but because other people pay them for shouting and denouncing corrupt officials. Oligarchs, for example, pay their journalists, and they write all kinds of criticism on competitors. Opposition oligarchs use-dependent people to take risks of them and so on. In general, it does not matter where the money comes from, and it is important to expose and, if possible, on camera so that you can see that they are individuals. That’s why many people started taking their selfies because the more a person likes himself, the more he is your client. Total clogging of the selfie network is an infection of the personality virus. At the bazaar, for example, where all persons buy and sell. Empty people, it is known, loves themselves most of all and runs to where the empty people gather, empty of empty, but who is shown on the screen and say that this is a star. That’s why the stars of the screen and the stars, in general, have got mixed up with stellar empty liberals. For example, one well-known oppositionist slept with a minor, and he still has a good relationship and mutual friendship with his sponsor. (for the sponsors of any perversion – it is a fact that is more important than another fact). If uncles with money say that a person does things, it does not matter what value, and if this very person scolds the authorities – this is the most useful person.
In a geopolitical confrontation in this way through a corrupt person, ( oligarch?) the most important to finish off the Eurasian person like a prostitute. Anyone who is willing to sell out or give up in this way makes a conscious choice not out of conviction but out of the calculation.
Chapter VI
Father of the people
The traditional people are child people. If you know the child, it is easy to direct them. The opposition says that the autocrat was lucky with the people. This is at first glance. Any Ulugbek Khan, leader Trotsky or President of the Kyrgyz people Akayev can lose the country and the people through the fault of the child. In fact, each of these intelligent leaders lost control of the people because they played the soft, wise rule. These are facts from history. Are the same Kazakhs at the level of the Soviet people of the 30s? And this is not a coincidence because such a coincidence is dangerous for everyone. All Central Asia consists of the traditional (Zerefs) peoples. Even the Soviet government met traditionally quietly, modestly, and not noticeably. Nothing has changed, and nothing has changed even now. Everything just went back to normal today – such a life such people have always had.
Simultaneously, millions of traditional Kazakh people from the villages rushed to the big cities-administrative centers, where mostly non-Kazakhs lived because the urban population was advanced (and newcomers looked them in the mouth, how all children look at their teachers at school). A new culture has always been formed in cities. Although, any person could then and today break out of the traditional village environment and move to the city. There, everyone can learn and become the same authority as your relatives. No one would hurt. That’s what cities are for so that students look into the mouths of teachers. And looking in the mouth is a culture of almost filial deference. All traditional people look in the mouth of all authorities and teachers. It depends on education and discipline.
Kazakhs were absorbed in urban life, Soviet urbanization, and now the market has literally swallowed them.
And the Kazakhs, who are accustomed to answering only to their kind (before the clan, but not before the state – A. B) learn to answer, while only to their families. If you are lucky, the steppe people are willing to invite you to their feasts in the past and now. The lucky respected Kazakhs invite everyone to visit; this is normal to show your high level. All traditional peoples have no other reason to invite guests. This is the culture. It’s a tradition to invite guests. One doesn’t interfere with the other.
Finally, former nomads are afraid to lose, and even they do not know what. For example, competition with their relatives, neighbors, just familiar people. The child is also afraid of getting lost. That is why many Kazakh Muslims say Shukur all the time; they do not look for good from the good. So we’re good, and we say Alla Shukur!
This is still the level of prohibitions or the very first level of taboos.
Not losing face is like not losing sheep. This is such a loss. That is why the steppe people in the past are not accustomed to any other type of responsibility, except for responding to their relatives and now just acquaintances. But don’t show yourself to the rams and don’t show your status to the rams? (although, of course, this “responsibility” to friends and relatives is more like a show-off, show-offs in modern terms). So, why doesn’t Yelbasy (or Putin in the North), who is lucky with the people (the people who are afraid of losing a non-essential show-off or don’t know what), rein in their corrupt officials, or rather servants? After all, all corrupt officials are officials of their system. Do not forget that Stalin led a policy based on state ownership, and Elbasy managed the Kazakh market after the General privatization. It’s easier for him.
If the people are a child, then the people of the child must have a father.
Or the father of the people, Elbasy is the greatest authority for them. Cult and fame do not arise from scratch. The same phenomenon has been and will continue to be the case for all non-urbanized traditional peoples who are afraid of losing any crumbs that fate and history have measured out.
Corrupt officials as market participants.
And no one is rushing to repress anyone because market aggregates are somewhat different from the motives that guided Stalin. For the market needs of the market actors. In order for the market to function even in the form of a demonstration or global show-offs, market participants are needed, which means that corrupt officials are also needed as subjects. So Elbasy can take away everything from competitors if he wants to, of course (In this sense, it is much more difficult for Putin). Or maybe he will try again to raise young people around him? But then he would be alone.
The traditional world can’t live without corruption?
And in this very market, the subjects of corruption feel great. The answer is simple because the basis of tradition is family. A traditional person thinks about the family. This is the will or law of the ancestors. There’s no getting away from it.
